Do you think Hilary Clinton would make a good president?

Question

What do you think? I think she'd do pretty well, despite previous rumors about her.

Kobacker59, even though I'm Pennsylvanian, from my observations, I must agree. I just wish our old Governer Ed Rendell would run. He's awesome.

Answer 1

I cannot find anything that talks about what she has done. I find a lot of things about accolades and honors she has been given, but to be honest, many Congressmen receive bogus honoraria. Nothing concrete though about what she has positively contributed to her constituency or the nation as a two-term Senator of the US. She has done much to widen the divide in partisan politics, and has been on the forefront of vilifying the Republican party and the current administration. But what positive measures can she be associated with since her election to Senate?

Answer 2

Rumors? Think not

Another Clinton in office would mean America being under the thiefdom of either a Bush or a Clinton for a total of at least 32 years, 36 if Hillary is re-elected (many now acknowledge that H.W. Bush pulled the strings as VP during the Reagan era), and they still say anyone can become President! What a pathetic joke!

Hillary Clinton surprised few when she announced her intention to run for the 2008 presidency in New York on Sunday.

Forecasters are already predicting a success for the Senator, meaning Americans will probably be living under the same hierarchical oligarchy that brought them rampant illegal immigration, the devaluation of the dollar, the gigantic deficit, 9/11, and hatred of the U.S. around the world. The electorate got bored of drinking Coke so now the establishment is going to provide Pepsi.

Clinton voted for the Patriot Act and she voted for the war in Iraq, but so many Democrats are blinded by the cult of personality that they will overwhelmingly vote to put this crime family back in office. While we have made some progress in educating liberals as to the phony staged consensus of the left-right paradigm, the fact remains that a majority still see the White House as some kind of political super bowl, where the success of their 'team' is the be all and end all - to the expense of America as a whole.

"I felt that it was appropriate under the circumstances, which really went back to 1998 under the Clinton administration's conclusion that the regime had to change, that the President (Bush) had authority to pursue that goal," said Hillary after giving her personal approval for the mess in Iraq.

The punch and judy show theatre of the troop surge debate characterizes Hillary's role in hoodwinking Americans perfectly. The debate is framed as not whether the U.S. should get out of Iraq altogether, but the relative minutia of whether to feed 20,000 more troops into the meat grinder or not. The Democrats play along with this farce and make empty threats of "non-binding resolutions" that have no teeth and mean absolutely nothing.

Clinton's campaign manager has already compared Hillary to former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and has outlined her style as "Strong on foreign policy. People have got to know you are going to keep them safe." This translates as more war, more dead Americans, and a further desecration of the tattered shreds of what's left of the U.S. Constitution.

Clinton is the ultimate elitist and represents the Democrats supposed base, the poor and downtrodden, about as much as Lindsay Lohan represents grace and dignity. She was sure to inform the likes of David Rockefeller and Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands as to her presidential aspirations during her visit to last year's Bilderberg conference in Ottawa Canada. Bilderberg has a proven history of acting in a kingmaker capacity. Both Bill Clinton and Tony Blair attended before becoming President and Prime Minister and the media reported that Bilderberg selected John Edwards as Kerry's running mate in 2004.

Answer 3

She is the dark horse at this point and can win..McCain will not win the Republican nom. people in his own party hate him...and Obama has no experience.

I would rather see Hillary as a VP...she is a very intelligent woman who has a lot to offer the nation..beyond what people here she is actually a moderate and is loved in NY where I live. She represents us with honor and respect...she deserves more respect than she has been getting.

Answer 4

Hillary Clinton is the WORST possible choice for President of the United States of America! Both she and her husband are criminals (Whitewater-gate), liars (Rose Law Firm) and sadly, much like rest of the old guard in D.C. a typical politician (I'm for the war, I'm against the war, I want us to win, but I don't want to send troops, let's bring the troops back, but let's cut the defense budget = paycut for military). Just my two pennies...

Answer 5

I hope anyone who feels the Clinton's are liars is ready to vote for anyone except a Bush republican.

The reason she MIGHT be good for the country is that we have given macho man politics a fair chance and you can see where it has gotten us: America in decline.

Lets listen to her. Then we can decide.

Answer 6

She'd be a great president. She's an excellent Senator for New York.

Answer 7

yes I do

Answer 8

YES,YES,YES