you get 1 chance to convience me so make it good and back it up with facts........ if you can convience me using facts, i will vote democrat this election?
2007-01-22 11:09:00 · 15 answers · asked by painfully yours 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The only thing that detracts from Bush's Presidency is his lack of on-camera charisma. I have heard even his harsh critics say that, in person, he if affable, friendly, and hard to dislike. However, on camera he just doesn't always make a good impression.
Reagan was the master of making the camera love him. No matter what he did or said, people adored him. Reagan just had a natural talent for being likable, and this crossed over even when viewing him on a tv screen.
Please, don't live with a lifetime of regret and remorse by voting Democratic. I keep hoping Condi Rice will run for President. Can you imagine how the popularity and respect for the United States would SOAR across the globe?
It may be easy to vilify a white American male, but imagine how tough it will be for all those Politically Correct people all over the world to condemn a smart, savvy, accomplished Black Woman.
2007-01-22 11:22:09 · answer #1 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
You must have Osama Bin Laden sitting across from you in the Cave. Where have you been? You could be anywhere in the World and hear about his incompetence. Would you stay on vacation while Katrina was drowning yourCitizens?
You probably don't even know the Constitution well enough to comprehend what the Simian Boy King has done in regards to taking away our rights as Citizens of the United States. Those acts in themselves should have everyone calling for his head.
http://www.impeachbush.tv/
2007-01-22 11:28:33 · answer #2 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The real question is you can support where Bush is a good President with his 24% approval rating. Lame Duck is the correct term for a poor President such as George W. Bush. Novembers elections and the popular vote win for Al Gore in 2000 is way proof enough for this, and Bush was appointed not the winner by the way.
2007-01-22 11:14:04 · answer #3 · answered by Earl 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
For me he is a good president because he is honest, he cares, he is patriotic, and he has so far done a very good job of protecting us against another 911. Everyone, even the best can make mistakes, so even if things have not gone as well as he and we would like in Iraq, I still think that these things take a long time, and with trust and patience, especially, we will see great results in the end. Bush, I am sure, has been a better president than Kerry or Gore would have been and our country is safer today because of him. The other two are dishonest, they only care about themselves and their own liberal agenda, and I would hate to think where we would be today if they had been saddled with the terrorist problem.
2007-01-22 11:23:34 · answer #4 · answered by mammabecki 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
He's destroying Iraq, killing their people, contaminating their
country with depleted uranium, all for something Saudia
Arabian terrorists did.
He's making the rich, wealthier, while the middle class is
falling into poverty.
He's fired & replaced everyone in his administration, except
Cheney.
He's caused us to lose most of our allies.
He's denied global warming, now there's a bill on his desk
to declare polar bears endangered next year.
There's still a hole where the WTC used to be.
There's an unbelievable amount of murders in New Orleans,
Detroit & Philadelphia because no one is minding the country.
45 Million Americans are without health insurance.
He's divided our country by wealth & by party affiliation.
2007-01-22 11:25:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
If you haven't been convinced by living everyday life in the United States over the past several years, there is nothing I or anyone else is going to have to say to make you understand the harm this man has caused to our beloved nation. If you want a hint, go ask a veteran who's had his benefits cut thanks to Bush, or a widow of someone who died for a war started on lies in Iraq or someone being tortured in your name in Guantanamo Bay who has no access to legal counsel, and who has sat there for the past several years, though absolutely no charges have been brought against him, or talk to the burgeoning numbers of terrorists now being trained in the Middle East who were not doing so before Bush came along. They are the correct people to ask, not I.
2007-01-22 11:16:34 · answer #6 · answered by melouofs 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
The war in Iraq was a pointless quest for oil
His anti-environmentalist views jepordise the ecology of the planet.
The american middle class is vanishing.
To him, only the rich matter.
He can't even make a speech without bunging up.
He's as much a religious fanatic as those hes fighting.
His greatest acheivement to date is bringing about the creation of the term 'bushism'.
2007-01-22 11:13:43 · answer #7 · answered by Pope Barley 4 · 7⤊ 3⤋
Well, first, you should vote for the person, not the party. You should pick who YOU think will do the best job based on their positions. Now to the question at hand---
Why bush is a crappy prez:
- Ran up huge deficit. Turned a surplus into largest deficits in history. National debt over 8 Trillion now.
- Went to war on faulty intelligence. Once he got in, his administration failed miserably at executing the resulting occupation. War has cost us hundreds of billions of YOUR tax dollars. Over $9 Billion has gone missing.
- Afghan war is a mess too
- Wants to change the constitution for things that affect a small number of our population.
- Administration failed on Katrina recovery efforts
- No domestic policy to speak of.
- Has done nothing to address the trade deficit.
- Allowed 9/11 to happen in spite of numerous warnings and at least one Pres. Daily Briefing indicating Al Qaeda tactic of 9/11 style attack.
- Campaigned as a uniter and not a divider. The US is more divided now than when he took office.
- Foriegn policy has turned post 9/11 support by many countries into more huge dislike for the US.
- Anti-terror policies have resulted in numerous civil liberty and constitutional infractions - illegal wiretaping, detention, kidnapping, etc. I don't care if his AG said it was ok.
2007-01-22 11:17:59 · answer #8 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 5⤊ 4⤋
Where do I begin...
He exhibits zero diplomacy when the President is suppose to be the country's highest level diplomat.
He allowed the neo-cons to convince him to invade Iraq without considering the long term ramifications.
He has done nothing to improve border security even after 9/11.
He is more loyal to friends than country.
He lacks basic knowledge of the friends and enemies of the US.
He alienates all who disagree with his views and only awards those who agree with him.
His leadership has ripped the country in half and lowered US standing in the world.
2007-01-22 11:11:45 · answer #9 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 8⤊ 4⤋
We were told that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, so our soldiers were sent there. Then it was reported that Iraq didn't have WMDs...
We were told that there were no "Black sites" in europe where American government troops (CIA) were torturing suspected terrorists. Then it was stated that the sites in Romainia and Poland have been closed...
The legislation allowing our government to tap our phones and read our emails, and what books we were reading at the library, was passed at 3:00am, in secret...
I'm getting writer's cramp...
2007-01-22 11:19:01 · answer #10 · answered by patrick 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋