English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

getting hit so we can be done with all of these stupid conspiracy theories

2007-01-22 10:44:50 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Other - News & Events

12 answers

Apparently, the government doesn't want the public to see what really happened at the Pentagon. Not surprising, considering that so much points to the government either being involved or orchestrating the whole thing:

1) Read "Operation Northwoods", the US government's formerly classified plans to develop a "terror campaign" to CREATE an "apparent threat to peace in the Western hemisphere" in 1962. Page 10 describes how to FAKE an attack using a commercial plane so to TRICK the public into supporting military action on Cuba/Castro. (Just for fun, pretend it says Iraq/Hussein or Afghanistan/bin Laden wherever it says Cuba/Castro, and see if anything sounds familiar.)

2) Note that Saddam Hussein was NOT tried for anything related to 9/11. Consider how much MORE money and effort was put into finding, trying, and executing HIM than in tracking down Osama bin Laden, who was allegedly responsible.

3) The man in the infamous needle-in-a-haystack "confession" tape is clearly NOT Osama bin Laden - compare with the FBI's own photos and description and see. The 9/11 attacks are not even mentioned in the FBI's Wanted poster for him. George W. Bush stated that he was "not concerned" about bin Laden because HE KNOWS that Osama had nothing to do with it, and that the U.S. already had plans for starting a worldwide war as of 9/9/01, two days BEFORE the faked attacks.

4) WHY, when Bush's scheduled appearance at an elementary school on 9/11/01 had been well-publicized, didn't the Secret Service evacuate hundreds of innocent children to safety, and whisk him away to an unknown, secure location IMMEDIATELY, if the U.S. was TRULY under attack by foreign terrorists. THREE allegedly suspicious incidents involving Middle Easterners threatening Bush were reported in the Florida town where he was staying on 9/10/01, yet instead of being rushed to safety, he continued his visit with the children (rendering him unavailable to make defensive decisions that only the President can make), and then gave a press conference at EXACTLY the time and place he was previously SCHEDULED to be. When his plane finally left Florida over a half-hour later, there was still NO military security escort. Isn't the President supposed to be protected at all costs in the event of a REAL attack on the nation? Shouldn't the schoolchildren have at least been made less of a target?

5) How did a piece of PAPER from inside the clothing of a man who was allegedly on a plane that EXPLODED in a fireball that was supposedly hot enough to vaporize the entire plane AND destroy a steel skyscraper, just happen to float out safely UNSINGED? Isn't it a little too convenient that similar items were miraculously found at the other crash sites, where the planes also mysteriously vaporized, unlike other plane crashes?

6) Larry Silverstein leased the money-pit WTC buildings just 6 weeks before 9/11, and protected them with several insurance policies that would pay out over $7 billion in the event of TWO destructive incidents (convenient, huh?!). Several requests for permits to demolish the buildings had been denied because they were full of asbestos. Fortunately, Silverstein had just negotiated the right to rebuild them in the event they were destroyed.

7) WTC7, another Silverstein property insured for hundreds of millions, was only the 3rd steel skyscraper in history to collapse due to a fire that didn't burn hot enough to actually melt steel (WTC 1 & 2 were the first two - other steel buildings with significantly larger and longer fires remain standing). In 2005, Silverstein admitted to having approved the controlled demolition of WTC7, which occured just hours after the attacks. WHEN did demolitions experts SET those charges throughout the building that day (amidst the carnage and rescue efforts), and wasn't it a bit risky setting explosives if there were lethal fires burning inside it? Why doesn't the offcial report on 9/11 mention the destruction of WTC7?

2007-01-22 13:26:18 · answer #1 · answered by gelfling 7 · 0 1

Is it really easier to believe a conspiracy theory rather than accept what all the eye witnesses and video shows?I know that many who jump into conspiracy theories enjoy all the social aspects of a family that keeps patting each other on the back as they agree with each other on every ides anyone puts forth
REALITY is :
the USA was attacked by terrorists that have DECLARED intent to destroy/harm the USA and Western Civilization...`
Denial coupled with a delusional belief that everyone loves us except our own government is absurd....
Most of the world would love to see the USA toppled..jealousy is and always has brought mankind grat disasters and death.

2007-01-22 14:45:17 · answer #2 · answered by ymicgee 3 · 0 0

We have. I've seen a video with a plane hitting the Pentagon. Every witness there said a plane hit the Pentagon. We have learned the truth.

2007-01-22 11:56:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

When our government deliberately denies us access to a simple video that could divulge the reality of what actually happened at the pentagon, it is done primarily so everyone can cover their butts and thus conspiracy theories will come into play. Truth in government is an oxymoron as they do have so many secrets to keep.

2007-01-22 10:51:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I like to get to the point. If someone starts to babble or doesn't peak my interesting in the first few sentences then I just click off If it's interesting or well written I would read an entire page

2016-05-23 22:57:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We know the truth about 9/11.

2007-01-22 11:24:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I think it might be classified to further protect our country, you know, safety reasons. Ariel views were shown on TV before, just not as close-up as some people (Terrorists) would like to have had them. That is a secretive place and closely guarded. Why do people have so many problems with that???? I don't think the USA intended this tragedy to happen.

Don't you want to stay free???

2007-01-22 11:35:27 · answer #7 · answered by Big V 2 · 1 1

Since a good friend watched the plane go into the pentagon, it was a plane. I think they don't want people to have to go through the emotions again. I certainly don't need it.

2007-01-22 11:05:50 · answer #8 · answered by istitch2 6 · 1 2

They wont show it, because they dont want the families to have to go through the emotion and trauma again. Plus, we have already seen the plane going into the building, what other footage can you possibly want??

2007-01-22 11:11:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I feel bad about 9/11 and the loss of life..I could care less about the world trade building because it set the stage. THAT WAS OUR STUPID POLITICIANS GIVING AWAY AMERICA! WTC was made of forgien steel!

2007-01-22 10:57:20 · answer #10 · answered by segabill 3 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers