Why did the Vikings get rid of Moss and Culpepper again?

Answer 1

We got rid of Moss because we thought we could do without him and that Culpepper was good enough to play without such a star. We got rid of Culpepper because he proved he was not good enough to play without Moss and he is a whiny *****. I would take Moss back, but not Culpepper.

Answer 2

Moss was a locker room problem and caused more problems than he was worth off the field. He took plays off, and had very little "team" attitude. Culpepper knows one play: drop back and throw deep, and pray Randy gets to the ball before anyone else. Worked good when Ocho Quatro was there, but when there was no Randy, there were only incompletions, interceptions, and really embarrassing boat trips. Culpepper proved he did not personify the leadership required of an NFL quarterback both on and off the field. He's a great, no good, no mediocre bench warmer in Miami, but the benches would stay pretty warm there without him. I wish him well in his next job as a tire changer at Firestone.

Answer 3

Moss-attitude-Culpepper- needed Moss!!

Answer 4

Because Moss plays with no heart (if he feels like playing at all) and Culpepper has lost it (meaning the skills).

Answer 5

They didn't think Culpepper would fully recover from his injury (which he didn't; he went down again this year)............& Moss was let go because of his attitude on & off the field. Now, how they thought they would be better without them both is a mystery to ME.

Answer 6

Moss -- Has too much of an attitude, and his skills are diminishing to the point that his attitude is harder and harder to take.

Culpepper -- he sucks. Period.

Answer 7

THEY ARE STUPID