English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Which of these two woman would be the better choice for President. Hillary (vinegar and spice) Clinton or Condelesa( black dynamite) Rice. and who should they choose as their running mates. A weak male or strong male figure or maybe a woman running mate.

2007-01-22 10:36:38 · 14 answers · asked by superjoezzz@sbcglobal.net 3 in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

To me this is an easy question. I would vote for Condi in a heartbeat. She is highly intelligent. She is not a conniving stab you in the back b**** like Hillary who has no limits on what she would do to gain power. Anyone who craves power as bad as Hilary is not fit to be in a position of power.

As far as running mates......For Condi .......I like Colin Powell or John McCain.

I can't honestly think of one person who would help Hilary win. I really would like to see Hilary get the nomination because that would ensure a Republican victory......too many people don't like her or trust her and that includes many members of her own party. Even less will support her after the primaries if she survives them

2007-01-29 21:31:09 · answer #1 · answered by Steve O 2 · 0 0

i do not imagine the USA isn't waiting for a lady Prez. in my opinion, both one among those females have undesirable subject matters which will be their monkeys on their backs all a thanks to the polls! Colon Powell for effective yet why Hillary Clinton two times? you should like her or you would have matched up some different person adverse to Condelesa. wish you spot my standpoint in any case and robust success on your candidate in '08!

2016-12-02 22:07:08 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Well, that's an easy answer if you believe the media.

I don't know for sure, but my money would be on Rice.

Hillary would be wise to pick a strong male.

Rice could run with just about any solid conservative.

2007-01-26 15:04:56 · answer #3 · answered by Marcus 3 · 0 1

Condelesa Rice was smart enough not to:

-Have illegal fundraisers
-Cheat people in a land deal
-Lie about lost transcripts that magically appeared in the white house
-Come up with a flawed universal health care plan that was soundly defeated when voted on
-Support a husband that was disbarred/impeached/committed adultery

The question is obvious, hillary is a bad choice.

2007-01-22 10:43:19 · answer #4 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 4 1

I think Condelesa Rice is smarter, although I wouldn't vote for her either....Bush tells her to squat and she shits....But IQ wise, I think Condelesa wins

2007-01-22 10:43:04 · answer #5 · answered by icemanind 3 · 1 1

Condi is smarter hands down. Hillary is far more devious.

I would like to see Condi as pres. I have no idea who she should pick for a running mate, just some one highly qualified.

2007-01-22 10:55:31 · answer #6 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3 1

Wasnt she already president?? OhHhhhhh.. that was her husband??

If Hilary Clinton thinks she is going to run, I am definitely going to vote for whoever runs against her. I cant stand that nasty woman..

2007-01-22 10:45:20 · answer #7 · answered by Tink 5 · 3 1

I will not vote for anyone related to bush or clinton.It's all a big scam being played on america that needs to end.Haven't bushes & clintons spent enough time in office?

2007-01-22 10:46:30 · answer #8 · answered by bradship4u 3 · 2 1

anyone woman who gets humiliated in front of the whole world by her husband and still stays with him,

lacks good judgement ,
is hopeless,
and is a total idiot.

my vote for black dynamite!

2007-01-22 10:43:15 · answer #9 · answered by chumpchange 6 · 4 1

Hilary Clinton

2007-01-22 10:41:34 · answer #10 · answered by itsALICE! 3 · 1 5

fedest.com, questions and answers