English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

23 answers

There is nothing to win and they don't want the troops home. They are building HUGE bases to house them for years to come. The New World Order has plans for World War 3. This is why they are attacking Syria and Iran soon. They seriously want to make a one world government out of the ashes of World War 3. Its insanity and we have to bring our boys home. Look at this video to see what the depleted uranium weapons are doing to Iraqis and our soldiers.

http://video.google.ca/url?vidurl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.ca%2Fvideoplay%3Fdocid%3D8771242169036524915%26q%3Ddepleted%2Buranium&docid=8771242169036524915&ev=v&esrc=sr9&usg=AL29H23Q18ExxsBCpTIXZZ9tmn9BEWTdxw

2007-01-22 10:24:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

First. Let's stop talking about "winning", this is not a football game with defined areas, referees, and time-keepers. This is an international effort to get a stable government in Iraq run by reliable and responsible people who want the best for their people.

Because Iraq had been run by a vicious dictator, that creature had to be removed from power. After that was accomplished, the UN forces there had to find the right people to establish and approve an article of government. This had been done.

Then disabling elements entered the picture and that is where we are now. As soon as the elected government of Iraq can bring order to the country, they will no longer need the UN forces that are there and all outside countries can remove their military units.

When that OBJECTIVE has been met, the term "WIN" can be applied.

2007-01-29 11:42:04 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Been there 4 · 0 0

allow the military to crush the enemy.Right now we have a military fighting with both hands tied behind their back.Bush making the knots,while the democrats scream at bush tighter.I'm no bush fan,but we need to crush the islamist radicals and yes it does mean innocent people will die,but that's why its war and not a play station game. The sooner we stop pussy footin in Iraq.The faster the Iraqi goverment can get control and then we can scale down.and leave. WAR IS WAR not a game,right now democrats and some republicans i think play too much politics with their x box games,if we fought the Germans like we have the insurgents we would all be speaking German. Let the Military fight and we win the war.It's that simple,right now their sitting ducks that cant even fire back until approved?? ,support the military .If someone shots at an American destroy the building or block,this is war and you win a war by wiping out the enemy.

2007-01-30 07:08:28 · answer #3 · answered by snowshoehippie 2 · 0 0

Bush is in straightforward terms a political animal. the only reason he might draw down the troops at this factor may be as a non everlasting degree to objective to prop up McCain. each and everything that guy does is administered by using a political filter out in the previous he does it. it relatively is why he's been this form of dismal failure. Obama's marketing campaign is a few lot greater advantageous than Iraq, and as nicely, McCain is on record as desiring our troops to stay in Iraq for one hundred years and build 17 everlasting militia bases there. no person will have faith that he won't re-installation those troops if (and at this factor it relatively is a extensive if) he have been to get elected. McCain is a hawk, and this us of a does not decide for yet another of his form interior the White residing house.

2016-11-01 00:48:18 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

We are there for a good reason. Lies or faulty Intel it doesn't matter. A free Iraq is the way to achieve destabilizing Iran and Syria who are the largest funding sources of terror on the planet.
This strategy can accomplish a goal with the least amount of US casualties.
A sectarian government in place and Iraqi's receiving oil revenue checks (just as in Kuwait) will shake the foundation of Iran and if Iran's foundation is cracked the Syrians don't have a leg to stand on.
They will either have to deal economically with the robust economy of Iraq and gain from the changes in the region or be undermined by their own peoples.
Iran's government will lose it's incentive to go nuclear lest they be cut out of the economic pie.

Their only option will be to change in order to survive.

This is why they are fighting so hard to keep Iraq destabilized as long as they can.

Then our troops can be re-deployed.

2007-01-30 00:52:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

President Bush should never have sent troops to Iraq in the first place. It is all his fault we have this war going on now. I don't see him going over there to Iraq and fighting! He should just make peace with Iraq and bring our troops home.

2007-01-29 07:44:25 · answer #6 · answered by Myndi 1 · 0 0

He first would have to define what winning the war in Iraq means. He would then have to realize that their is no way for him to will something to be. He would then have to order the troops home and stop wasting their lives on a distraction from the real war on terrorism.

2007-01-22 10:26:42 · answer #7 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 2 0

One must start by closing down the media in Iraq, no TV, No Reporters, this would send a shiver of fear into the Insurgence, then send the additional troops.

60 day news black out, and let the cleansing began.

61st day the new and improved Iraq.

2007-01-30 09:01:47 · answer #8 · answered by impalersca 4 · 0 0

There is no easy solution to any war. Its a fact that people die in wars. By all standards the casualty rate for this war is extremely low compared to other wars we have fought. In Viet Nam 1000 men per month were dying. This is a war against terrorism. It is not limited to any one country and has to be met wherever you find it.

Lets look at it this way....say for example you have cancer. You have to treat it aggressively until it is eradicated. If it appears somewhere else in your body you can't say "well I already treated it in one place and beat it". You have to go at it wherever you find it.

Terrorism is a cancer upon the face of the earth and it needs to be eradicated wherever it rears its head.

2007-01-29 08:50:45 · answer #9 · answered by Steve O 2 · 0 0

Uh, try-sending in 21,500 Rangers, Seals and other "Special Forces" to eradicate the armed Militias we are now being allowed to do!
Embed Our troops into the Iraqi Forces to effectively serve as Internal Affairs agents to eradicate planted insurgents and stabilize the Iraqi security forces!

I'd swear I heard someone recently TRY to tell you all that not that long ago in a special speech?!!

2007-01-22 10:29:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers