Is the HyperLiberal Hillary the one?
Would you vote for her?
2007-01-22 10:01:35 · 29 answers · asked by sessy.btch 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
More than half of the people would vote for a female president but only a few could agree. We would need a dynamic female to vote for. I dont think the radical leftist Hillary is the one.
2007-01-22 10:40:56 · answer #1 · answered by Richie.Rich 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't pay much attention to politics so I wouldn't know if I agree with Hillary's ideas. But I think a woman should be president. Anybody here sick of all these white Protestant MEN presidents? There is nothing wrong with allowing a female be president--we are not inferior to men! I think this would help people respect women more, too.
I think the American public is warming up to the idea more. We've got women presidents on TV shows-it's a start.
2007-01-22 10:08:34 · answer #2 · answered by toxicPoison 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the U.S. would be ready for a female president, if it was the right female. My idea of "right" would be someone more like Margret Thatcher or Golda Meier than Hillary. I'd never vote for her because she's too liberal. Her sex has absolutely nothing to do with my decision. It's not even a factor in that equation.
2007-01-22 10:09:27 · answer #3 · answered by texasjewboy12 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd vote for Laura Bush with Condi as VP.
Hillary is too much of a lightning rod. Negative vibes follow her. A dark, rain-type cloud seems to always overshadow her. And if someone could tell me what her accomplishments are so we could take a look at something with substance, I'd like to?
No, I won't vote for Hillary.
2007-01-22 10:21:04 · answer #4 · answered by lindakflowers 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I can see nothing wrong with a female president, unless it's to be Hillary! I would never vote for a known liar! (Though I have voted for people who turned out to be liars!)
2007-01-22 10:06:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Of course not. It makes for great television and many people envision themselves as being openminded and forward thinking. But, people act differently when the spotlight is not on them(i.e. in the voting booth).
Hillary has no chance and neither does Obama. It doesn't make them less qualified or bad in any way. It's just the reality of the American voting public.
2007-01-22 10:05:49 · answer #6 · answered by summit_of_human_intellect 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO, not because i think she isn't qualified. simply because she has already served 8 yrs in the Whitehouse, a person can only serve 2 terms in the white house be it first lady or the president... i just feel that there is a conflict of interest. I believe her intentions are egotistical in nature... the first woman president she would be immortalized. Smart lady however vary vain.
2007-01-22 10:39:08 · answer #7 · answered by ALEXK31 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't know if I would vote for her, but yes, we're definitely ready for a woman president. Look at other countries like Germany and Finland! It's our time now.
2007-01-22 10:04:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think we are ready for female president or a president who isnt white . But definetly not Hillary
2007-01-22 10:05:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Hillary for president. Hurray.
2007-01-22 10:04:11 · answer #10 · answered by ignoramus 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋