2007-01-22 09:29:51 · 12 answers · asked by Feelsgood 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
A lot of answers point toward the liberals support of murdering the unborn to control the population.
Maybe the liberals would perfer to murder the children based on sex too?
2007-01-22 09:37:55 · update #1
It appears that liberals are self loathing individuals.
That also explains the self loathing they have for America.
They try to shift their disgust with themselves to the rest of us.
2007-01-22 10:00:18 · update #2
They should be. Abortion and stem cell research (as it stands at this moment) are murder. I believe that one day we will be able to figure out a viable alternative to human embryo stem cell research. Please God make it soon.
2007-01-22 09:36:58 · answer #1 · answered by iplaybass1956 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
EASY ANSWER.......eagles are rare and beutiful creatures whose existence is threatened by .....Human Monsters that are so plentiful they are destroying everything.
2 is company but 3 BILLION is a crowd.....face the facts..Humanity is a disease destroying it's host the earth.
Will humanity do something about it's...numbers...well abortion is a start......Hitlers' MOM should have tried it.
Most children are the result of recreational sex anyway...who needs em
2007-01-22 09:57:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because humans are not endangered like Eagles, less humans wouldn't hurt the population like it would for eagles.
2007-01-22 10:30:45 · answer #3 · answered by A nobody 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Humans aren't in danger of extinction.
There have been 40 million abortions since 1973 and only 1 million adoptions.
People that protect the eagle eggs take responsibility and FUND the care of the baby eagles.
What do you propose to do with all the human eggs?
--------------------------------------
I thought the republicans believe in personal responsibility? In consequences for your actions. If there are millions more unwanted babies what are your suggestions as to what to do with them? There are millions of orphans NOW!
2007-01-22 09:36:14 · answer #4 · answered by Jamie R 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because humans are far from being extinct. In fact, we need to figure out how to control the birth to death ratio. Because as of now, far more babies are being born than there are deaths. Mostly due to illegal immigration.
2007-01-22 09:36:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I do suppose a female eagle understands the point of laying the eggs and protecting them, not dumping them on the ground. I guess humans are more "enlightened". Maybe, maybe not.
2007-01-22 09:34:18 · answer #6 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋
We are not endangered or near extinction. We have not had our population wiped out by the more superior species on the planet. You actually make a case FOR abortion!
2007-01-22 09:34:20 · answer #7 · answered by soulsearcher 5 · 3⤊ 5⤋
There is no imminent danger of humans becoming extinct....yet.
2007-01-22 09:32:36 · answer #8 · answered by Sun Spot 4 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Because we don't count
2007-01-22 09:33:00 · answer #9 · answered by Angell 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
You gonna save that sperm when you jack-off? or will you flush it?
2007-01-22 09:38:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋