English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ever since Shah Rukh Khan became a superstar in bollywood, every second Indian child I know is named Rahul or Raj whether they are North, South, East or West Indian. Whats up with this? When did Raj become a South Indian name for Pete's sake?
Do you think we should continue with this copy-cat trend?

2007-01-22 09:19:35 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting Baby Names

8 answers

People associate names with good looking movie stars...it's just natural. I wouldn't worry about it. People are just naturally sheep who like to follow the crowd. But there's no harm in this when it comes to baby names. Only if you're a lemming and there's a looming cliff ahead...

2007-01-22 14:37:39 · answer #1 · answered by LindaLou 7 · 0 0

I've never heard these names before, sorry.

2007-01-22 17:23:16 · answer #2 · answered by BarbieQ 6 · 0 0

I have never heard this name before

2007-01-22 18:01:06 · answer #3 · answered by nawnndawn 4 · 0 1

You must have other priorities besides worrying about what people name their children.

2007-01-22 17:28:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

no time to step out and be unique

2007-01-22 18:00:54 · answer #5 · answered by Debra T 2 · 1 0

no let people pick what ever they like

2007-01-22 21:54:13 · answer #6 · answered by Wicked 7 · 0 0

i have never heard of it before.

2007-01-22 17:39:33 · answer #7 · answered by jamey m 3 · 0 1

They don't sound common to me!

2007-01-22 17:44:50 · answer #8 · answered by syznotch 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers