whats better raw or smackdown?

Question

def not raw, raw has dumb story lines and im sick of the dumb ppl on it, smackdowns more fighting and not that stupid with story lines, because vince is greedy he has some better ppl on raw, and most of u just like the storylines more than the fighting! wwf was the best. smackdown has the potential

Answer 1

usally i would say raw but lately it sucks so im gonna have to say SD better storylines better superstars

Answer 2

Defintiely SMACKDOWN! I watch Smackdown all the time and don't care for RAW anymore since the team of King, Coach, and Styles was no longer working together. Smackdown has got Cole and JBL and JBL is very fun to listen to. Former Smackdown commentator Tazz and current RAW commentator Jerry "The King" Lawler are too impartial.

Also, you've got The Miz, Jimmy Wang Yang, King Booker, MVP, and Takanka just to name a few. I've like to see Tatanka and The Miz kick more butt.

RAW is the same al the time. And you've got Vince there each and every week making matches, not his so-called "Chief Executive" Jonathan Coachman. RAW is Vince McMhaon's show, there is no general manager on it. Smackdown is Teddy long's show who is the general manager of the show.

I am tired and bored of RAW, I love watching Smackdown! The only thing I find remotely interesting about RAW is Umaga and his manager Armando Alejandro Estrada.

Answer 3

i might want to say Smackdown in the present day. Smackdown presently were showing alot extra effective high quality wrestling suits and performance been providing really strong storylines and rivalries. they have further new superstars onto the type who're tremendous wrestlers and entertainers, and turning out to be stars have had strong pushes of their career at the same time as being on Smackdown. Smackdown's call suits were tremendous aswell, they offer others a danger each and every of the time for the call and continuously have a worth champion. The call suits are continuously very thrilling and thrilling. All of this in the present day makes Smackdown merely abit extra effective than raw. raw are doing o.k. yet Smackdown are merely edging them in the present day and giving them some strong competion. If Smackdown retains going like this raw is going to be forced to attempt to do extra effective to be the volume one type in WWE. both are doing tremendous in the present day although and keep on recuperating each and every of the time.

Answer 4

Better wrestling and better storylines make Smackdown the better choice. Some of my favorites are on RAW, but that show is weighed down by old, rehashed wrestlers and gimmicks. Shawn Michaels and HHH are two of the best wrestlers in the biz, but their DX gimmick is tired. Also, Ric Flair is a legend, but even legends should know when to hang it up. Smackdown has younger performers such as Batista and Mr. Kennedy to set a solid foundation for the future. Kennedy may shoot off at the mouth, but his in-ring abilities (and the way he cheats), remind me of Flair in his prime. Also, Smackdown has Kane, 'Taker, and King Booker in the lineup but they manage to work in the younger guys for a well-rounded performance. Heck, some of the best matches around have been between young guys like London and Kendrick verses older, established quality wrestlers like Regal and Taylor.

Smackdown gets my vote!

Answer 5

raw is better in my opion just you can't wait for raw to come on but u can just look at a smackdown spoiler to c what happens plus like two months ago batista vs booker it was the same ole bull crap ever week. but raw is pretty much the same but more acton pac

Answer 6

Raw is better and Smackdown is second rated.

Answer 7

i like raw way better and it is not just because of the names it seems like raw is much more put together

Answer 8

I think RAW is better because it has my man John Cena!

Answer 9

raw

Answer 10

raw