If you could create your own "political party" for presidency.....?

Question

What would you call it?
What would be your 3 major "stands"?
What would your party have that our current choices do not?

Answer 1

It would be a non-partisan party. I would call it that, the NON-PARTISAN PARTY.

1. We stand for Americans.
2. We stand for Honesty
3. We stand against taxes.

Honesty

Answer 2

What would you call it?
I'd call it the A Party.

What would be your 3 major "stands"?
- Legalizing abortion on a national level, because I believe that everyone should be given an option. For those who think it's wrong, there's a simple answer - don't do it. Just because a lot of people think something is wrong doesn't meant it should be outlawed. A lot of people think education is stupid, so should we stop that too? No. Everyone deserves a choice.

- Legalizing the death penalty on a national level. We have inmates who sit in jail and rot for life. If the death penalty was legalized, all the "scum" and "crap" we like to call those who're "lifers" in prison, would be sentenced to death. This would solve 2 problems: 1. It would save a hell of a lot of money that we spend on housing, meals, etc. 2. It would help clear out the over populated, disgustingly crowded prisons. Unconventionally, it would also teach people that if you do something bad, you're going to pay a blood price.

- High standards for education. I know too many people who aren't interested in learning, who aren't getting a good enough education. It's the readers of the the world today who are going to succeed, make a good life, and make a difference. People who're interested in slacking, who think school isn't that "important" will be given the opportunity to have a higher education, have a higher learning capacity. Education is one of the most important things, especially in today's world.

What would my party have? It would have the distinction between religion and politics. When it comes to religion, my party can do that on their own time, practice their religion when they must, but keep it a completely separate topic from political issues. It would be religiously unbiased.

Answer 3

I would create a Federalist party. We are supposed to have this kind of Government in the United States but the Federal Government is going too far in removing states rights. Californian passed legislation banning a dangerous herbal remedy. Then the makers of this drug/herb went and bought legislation from the Federal government making it illegal to regulate this substance. So now neither the Federal or State governments can regulate herbal substances.

The list goes on and on. There are federal laws that parody every state law now and prosecutors can chose which they want to prosecute with. It is heading in a very bad direction because the federal government is so retarded and easily bought.

The Feds cannot recall beef, they cannot say where contaminated beef was sent to. This is why they announce voluntary recalls, extreme hypocrisy. Power should fall down, central government should deal exclusively with central issues.

There are mathematical grounds for this stupidity also based on probability. Let's say I have 50 school systems trying to improve education, as long as none are evil they can all try stuff and share success. With a retarded central government there are no mistakes or they cannot be detected. No one learns from other's experience.

1. Authority is reserved by the central government for central issues.
2. States rights are given preferred treatment.
3. States are represented in foreign trade in a trade body.

Answer 4

What would you call it: - "True American Party"

What would be your 3 major "stands"? -
1. Individual Rights
2. Abolishing of Income Tax
3. Life Time Jail Sentence for any political convicted of corruption

What would your party have that our current choices do not?
No taxpayer funded political campaigns!

Answer 5

The Freedom Party. 1) Free education for all and an international testing program like the ancient Chinese bureaucratic testing system for equal opportunity to ascend in pay and position. 2) Severe tax for any business outsourcing American jobs to other nations.3) Nationalization of U.S. oil interests to pay off the national debt. The party would support lowering the legal voting age and proxy vote for minor children. In other words, parents, as in northern European nations, would have their own vote AND a vote for each of their children. This strengthens and stabilizes a nation by giving issues, such as early childhood education and child healthcare, a fair share of power and builds stronger national futures, whereas, in nations today without child proxy vote, the largest voting block, aging babyboomers, do not support issues that will outlive them.

Answer 6

i would call it the party party.
we would be for legalization of marijuana.
we would be for "boozeday tuesdays". (with a new national day off ...wednesday)
we would be for a party in every americans home, at least once a week.

our party would have fun.

if people would relax once in a while it might make all the other crap bearable on a regular basis. if i could legally smoke a bowl while the president is telling me all these horrible things are going to happen on the news. i wouldn't want to kill myself when he talks.

Answer 7

I have heard two that are noteworthy!

On the Tonight Show George Clooney announced he would belong in the "Yeah I did that" Party-of which I could support!

Then there is the rumor of Haggard and Foley forming the "BathHouse Party"

LMFAO!!!!

Answer 8

No, "workstation" potential "hateful in direction of human beings i do no longer provide a rattling approximately." It potential asserting rubbish that in basic terms isn't actual, then slurring people who factor out how incorrect you're. working example..." Liberals deny the obtrusive yet their ideology in fact controls the information media" that's no longer obtrusive, that's a pathetic falsehood and a stupid fantasy. there is very just about NO liberal voice heard interior the media, mutually as that of the far top is blasted out on publicly owned radio stations, hundreds of them, every day. "and easily dominates the entertainment industry." Which could no longer probable remember much less. "Over ninety% of information media, admitted they vote strictly for democratic applicants." that's no longer actual, neither is it remotely appropriate. newshounds let us know what got here approximately, no longer what they think of. Who they voted for could no longer probable remember much less. Nor does balloting for Democrats recommend you're a liberal. It in basic terms makes it unlikely you're an extremist conservative. "while liberals created political correctness," We did no longer, the ultimate created this pathetic meaningless term so they does no longer could answer for his or her bigotry. "it seemed to be one factor then progressed into yet another factor. as a replace of being certainty pushed, workstation relatively progressed into turning out to be, a litmus attempt for themes and comments, in keeping with favoritism to liberal regulations, agendas and comments." which does no longer exist outdoors The us of a mag. "workstation potential you won't be able to make actual based statements, in the event that they do no longer impact the liberal viewpoint, favorably." Absolute horse manure. "Is political correctness in basic terms an abuse of potential by using the liberal media to choose far left politics and viewpoints?" of direction no longer. there is not any liberal media, and lots left politics are not famous by using every physique outdoors of a few small-circulate magazines and in step with risk Pacifica information. There are some million/2 a dozen elected officers who must be defined as far left. there is not often ANY far left in this us of a, which runs from the middle to the far top, and the left, even extremely liberal human beings are not often ever heard from interior the media.