English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The explosives used to bring down the World Trade Center (Buildings 1, 2, and 7) on 9/11 has exposed the clean-up workers to deadly toxins that have already killed 90 responders. Mayor Bloomberg (an obvious member of the elitists) is fighting the judge's order to continue the payments. Since this court case will ultimately lead to the nation's discovery that 9/11 was an inside job, do you agree with Bloomberg that this should all be...swept under the rug???
http://www.nypost.com/seven/01212007/news/regionalnews/mike_asks_judge_to_halt_wtc_payments_regionalnews_susan_edelman.htm

2007-01-22 06:55:03 · 4 answers · asked by protocols 2 in Politics & Government Government

http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/forum/thread8820.html

2007-01-22 07:57:03 · update #1

4 answers

They want to stop paying because it's expensive and could possibly lead to a lawsuit that would require a lot more money. If they didn't use masks, then I'm certainly not opposed to stopping payments. This country is too eager to blame others for their own mistakes.

The conspiracy stuff is just retarded though.

2007-01-22 07:14:04 · answer #1 · answered by Linkin 7 · 1 1

I feel bad for those who are sick but to not wear a mask in that environment was just plain stupid! My husband worked at the site during the recovery period and he wore a mask every second he was there! ALL his co-workers did to. So I guess those dummies brought this on themselves. But all that money is floating around so why not help pay for their care? It's the right thing to do.

And I'm ignoring the conspiracy-theory part of your post because it's just too boring.

2007-01-22 15:07:02 · answer #2 · answered by stony1111 4 · 1 1

... How does this prove that 911 was an inside job? That's quite a jump.... they won't make the payments for the sick from the WTC, so 911 must be an inside job. That doesn't make any sense!

2007-01-22 15:01:18 · answer #3 · answered by Pfo 7 · 1 0

I think the point protocols is trying to make is the EPA declared the air safe to breath eventhough they knew it wasn't, the EPA was forced to say this by the govt, another cover-up perhaps.

2007-01-22 15:48:41 · answer #4 · answered by wtfsept11 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers