Jaques Kallis must be counted as the best allrounder of today. He is an elegant and flowing batsman and a more than useful bowler. He is also the only allrounder in the game to have scored the "all rounder's double" of 8,000 runs and 200 wickets in both tests and ODIs. Sanath Jayasuriya has achieved that feat in ODIs but not Tests, and Sir Garfield Sobers achieved it in Tests only.
Other good all rounders:
Batting:
Shahid Afridi, Paul Collingwood, Chris Gayle,
Sanath Jayasuriya, Jacques Kallis, Justin Kemp, Shoaib Malik, Abdul Razzaq, Scott Styris, Andrew Symonds,
Bowling:
Dwayne Bravo,
Andrew Flintoff, Irfan Pathan, Shaun Pollock, Chaminda Vaas, Daniel Vettori, Shane Watson, Jacob Oram,
Wicketkeeping:
Mahendra Singh Dhoni, Adam Gilchrist, Kumar Sangakkara
2007-01-22 07:37:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by bazz2202 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Dear Friend,
It is no doubt Jacques Kallis of South Africa.
Name: Kallis, Jacques H (South Africa) Born: 16/10/1975
108 tests 180 innings 8351 runs at an avg. 55.3, 24 centuries, 207 wickets at an avg 32.18, 103 catches
242 ODI's231 innings 8327 runs, at an avg 43.6, 14 centuries, 218 wickets at an avg 31.31, 93 catches
I think these are the fantastic stats of a great all rounder and I think he s the best in the business.
2007-01-22 06:57:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by bharat s 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't see Jayasuriya as much of a bowler, viv richards used to also bowl a bit in one-dayers but I wouldn't classify him an all-rounder.
Flintoff's batting is not up to scratch.
Symonds has not lived up to lofty expectations.
In all seriousness, Warne's past 2 or 3 years with the bat elevates him into all-rounder status - he has retired with over 3000 runs to his name and a top score of 99.
2007-01-22 06:48:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Daryl H 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
1.Roy{Andrew Symonds}
2.Cameron White
3.Andrew Flintoff
4.Brett Lee{sort of}
5.Paul Collingwood
6.Shane Watson
2007-01-23 17:54:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Indian_P 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
nevertheless assuming no "WWE" income: Terry Funk. As I suggested in the previous, if he could no longer out-wrestle you he'd out-combat you. If he could no longer out-combat you, he'd out-"loopy" you. Bret Hart. Hate to work out Dynamite depart so quickly, however the Hitman might in basic terms out-wrestle him and make him faucet to the Sharpshooter. Sting. slightly greater advantageous wrestler than Savage, i think of. Sting might win by using submission to the Scorpion Deathlock. Chris Benoit. rattling...what a adventure-up! Chris' potential income may be the version right here. Dean might finally faucet to the Crippler Crossface. Kurt perspective. As large as Owen replaced into, so is Kurt. Kurt's meaner and greater ferocious. No submission right here, Kurt might in basic terms could placed on Owen out and pin him. Hulk Hogan. Hogan CAN wrestle. he's greater and greater acceptable than Austin, too. The Undertaker. Shawn's stable, real stable. I in basic terms think of the Undertaker can beat him. Ric aptitude. aptitude had no difficulty out-wrestling the vast men. The Rock may be no diverse.
2016-11-01 00:16:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by ridinger 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
To your question Flintoff my opinion Kallis
2007-01-22 07:10:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by akband 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
flintoff and Jacques Kallis
2007-01-22 07:15:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by FRIENDS FOREVER 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
flintoff
2007-01-22 17:29:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by john 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i go for option anyother (shane watson, jacques kallis, etc)
2007-01-22 06:46:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by sam 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
kallis and sangakara
2007-01-22 12:44:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋