http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm
G o d damn Liberal media-drive-by scum Fox News lies again!
2007-01-22 06:40:33 · 14 answers · asked by KellyRileson R 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Lib Elite Fox News. Wow, what a title. I am looking in TV Guide and can't find it. Can you locate it for me.
Oh, by the way, FDR only had an approval rating of 31% in one month of his long career.
Here's what we will do. We will ask 1000 strong Bush supporters what they think of Pelosi. Then we would have enough ammunition for you to ask for impeachment of the Speaker?
2007-01-22 07:29:03 · answer #1 · answered by Jimfix 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Since when was the Presidency a popularity contest? He doesn't care about it, nor do we. It could drop off the face of the planet and he still wouldn't care. That's a man with strong convictions. That's what makes a leader. Standing firm and not backing down because someone doesn't like you. Grant it he is wrong about somethings, but even we Conservatives can admit that. We conservatives are the ones keeping his numbers down. This nation is more right leaning than left. The votes last November showed that. The state votes for Abortions, and homosexual partnerships prove this country still leans right. Although some voted for change in government we did elect GWB and APPROVE him to be our President.
2007-01-22 06:53:34 · answer #2 · answered by mbush40 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Well, since I don't give a fart about polls, plus the fact Bush is a lameduck President. Who really cares. I know Bush could give a damn less about what any poll says. Polls are for people who are too stupid or lazy to get information to decide an issue and sheepishly go with the majority.
2007-01-22 06:58:55 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
each and every election cycle pollsters are rated by using the accuracy of their polls. Rasmussen costs relatively and has been doing so for a protracted time. Rasmussen's technique *does* variety using fact they continuously pollprobable electorate mutually as relatively some different pollsters are inconsistent, polling probable electorate on the factor of election day yet widening out their polls to registered electorate or all human beings at different situations. All american polling is left friendly mutually as probable voter polling is robust friendly. in case you choose for to understand the election effects nonetheless, pass with probable voter polling, in basic terms like Fox.
2016-11-01 00:16:19 · answer #4 · answered by ridinger 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shows that I'm not following the herd. That I have a mind of my own and heed my own counsel.
I'm not big on following the crowd. I don't need my feelings or beliefs validated by others.
2007-01-22 06:59:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Are you for or against Fox news, or does it depend on the results of the particular poll? I don't pay much attention to polls because seems that they can be manipulated, besides that I have never been polled nor has anyone I know.
2007-01-22 06:48:00 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Last poll I saw results from surveyed 1,000 people out of a country with 300,000,000!
And claimed that the loaded questions they did not dare to show were accurate within 3%.
LOL!!!
2007-01-22 06:49:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I am not a Bushie, but after looking at those approval numbers, I would have to think there is a problem in the gathering or computing of those numbers. They cannot be right. Those numbers are way to high.
2007-01-22 06:56:29 · answer #8 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
When Bush is hanged, we should let him wear his prep-school beanie so he can die with dignity. Otherwise, those who worship such pampered pipsqueaks will be outraged and will start an insurrection. Since our vol army doesn't seem to be able to protect anybody, we'll have to call in the Ethiopian army to put the Bushwhackoff sectarian violence down.
2007-01-22 08:10:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
couldn't care less. i didn't vote for the man so he'd be afraid to make a decision. i didn't vote for the man so he'd lose any principles he might have at the first sign of discontent. i didn't vote for him so he'd be wishy-washy.
2007-01-22 07:05:10 · answer #10 · answered by political junkie 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋