NOOOOO!!!!! Not in a million years!!! I would vote for ANYONE before her!
2007-01-22 06:03:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Centurion529 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
The thought of Hillary having control of our military complex is the scariest thought that jumps out, with this question. There is a mutual hate between the two, plus Hillary has a natural inclination to use diplomacy in place of military might.
On the surface, most people would agree that diplomacy is the better avenue to take, as I do too! However, the Clinton's took diplomacy to a fault, with the scams put on them by N.Korea, or the Clinton's inviting Chinese scientist to visit our very secret Los Alamos facility, or their failures to use our military complex to retaliate for six separate attacks on the US, by Islamic extremists. That number does not include the disasters of 9/11!
The Clinton's never had the ability to know when diplomacy should end and military consideration to begin. They resisted because they lacked courage, and commitment for a safe America. My answer to your question is that Hillary Clinton would make a terrible president. Our Enemy would definitely have the upper hand when they know that their adversary isn't inclined to work from strength!
2007-01-22 06:27:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by briang731/ bvincent 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yep and that's why I'm voting for her. She has a good grasp on what's going on in the world, has a distinguished record as a US Senator and isn't afraid to speak her mind and stand up for what she believes. And isn't it time we had a woman in the Oval Office? Could she do any worse than the current occupant? Highly unlikely.
Hillary in '08
2007-01-22 06:28:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I think that being the first female president she will have a lot to prove. This would work in our favor. I truly believe that she would be great. Winning would also pave the way for more women in politics and send a message to our daughters. Yes.
2007-01-22 06:13:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Steff 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
If she pays attention to what the american people want, like an end to the war, better quality of life for everyone and a strong economy with lots of jobs. Things could always improve.
2007-01-22 06:05:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bruce 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
HELL NO!! I'd rather elect the Energizer bunny than her!! While we are definately moving toward having a woman president, I cannot see her as being the right choice.
2007-01-22 06:08:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mrs Z. 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
She has potential. She is a very intelligent woman. She's not my favorite, I like John Edwards for his anti-poverty initiative but that could change depending on what the canidates have to say on a number issue.
2007-01-22 06:11:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Not in my personal opinion. I think she is a megalomaniac and a self-serving criminal.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and I am not trying to convert anyone to my way of thinking. But this is just how I feel.
2007-01-22 06:09:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Leah 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Absolutely, I'll even contribute to her campaign.
2007-01-25 06:24:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by samitude 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
DO YOUR OWN IN DEPTH RESEARCH AND YOU'LL FIND OUT HOW REALLY BAD SHE WOULDBE FOR THIS ENTIRE COUNTRY.
2007-01-22 06:51:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by tcbtoday123 5
·
0⤊
0⤋