English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've heard many people talk casually about being pro war. I don't think they would be so unconcerned if they or someone they care about were there.

2007-01-22 05:22:55 · 8 answers · asked by Vlasko 3 in Politics & Government Politics

8 answers

I agree, there is only one member in House/Senate/White House/Pentagon that has a family member in the military, only one from what I have read. Now if all these rebulicans are so gung ho about the war why arent more of their children fighting for their beliefs? You know the interesting fact is the majority of the people fighting these wars are those of low income who generally tend to vote democratic, not all but a majority...

Umm, global warming is due to air pollution from automobiles, not quite sure what cleaning high ways has to do with it but if you want to look like an idiot then ok, leave that up there. I think what you had meant to say was the hippies should buy battery operated cars or something along the lines of that and not "Clean some highways to stop global warming". That damn Mc D's cup on the side of the road is killing that ozone layer... :)

2007-01-22 05:28:56 · answer #1 · answered by str8stroke 1 · 3 0

That rule would clean out almost all the Reps from congress, and we Dems would have no opposition in making America great again.

2007-01-22 06:01:35 · answer #2 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 1 0

Heck ya! We all know if the suits had to get out there with sand in their ears and blood on their hands they would have an entirely different approach to War.



Good Luck & Blessings

2007-01-22 05:27:03 · answer #3 · answered by Wood Smoke ~ Free2Bme! 6 · 3 1

But we do have friends and relatives there. They volunteered many after the war was already not going well. You are an arrogant sumbitch aren't you. How about we add that all of those against the war lose their citizenship after it is won.

2007-01-22 05:31:41 · answer #4 · answered by Tommy G. 5 · 0 3

Then we'd only have about 500 troops on the ground.

2007-01-22 05:30:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Why not? And while we're at it you hippies that want to stop global warming and pollution can go and clean up a few hundred high ways.

2007-01-22 05:27:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I like that idea, agreed they who wants, should go fight

2007-01-22 05:27:38 · answer #7 · answered by joymlcat 3 · 3 0

See, I know that some people are thick-headed and the like but I would think even you would realize that, with an all-volunteer military, THAT'S EXACTLY THE WAY IT IS NOW!!!

HERE'S YOUR SIGN!!!

2007-01-22 05:28:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers