Bill Clinton gave an interview to Germany's Spiegel in which he said,
"The American people owe Hillary a debt of gratitude for all that she's done for them. She gave up a career in law and politics for them and for me as well - I already know how much I owe her. So, the Oval Office is owed to her because not only does she deserve it but she earned it. Look at all that she's been through, I know I've contributed my fair share. She'll be a great president, even better than me."
Do you agree with him on all those counts?
2007-01-22 04:51:55 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Who forced her to give up a career? I would feel better if I would have never heard the Clinton name. God help us if she gets in
2007-01-22 04:58:28 · answer #1 · answered by 51 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
The American people owe Hillary nothing. When she took a husband in politics she knew what to expect. She is too far out in left field to handle the job. Why would we want her for president if she is so stupid to stay with a man who openly cheated on her and then lied about. No Hilliary.
2007-01-22 05:05:17 · answer #2 · answered by Debra M 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't owe her anything she gave up for her husband. That was a Clinton family decision not America's business. By this account then my mom deserves to be president too. Personally I don't want her as president, why should my country get messed up more because she had a lousy marriage?
2007-01-22 05:01:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
This sense of entitlement is the hallmark of the liberal mindset. NO NO NO. Hilary deserves only what she has/will earned, she gave up her career on her own The American people owe her nothing, but she owes the American people plenty starting with the truth.
2007-01-22 05:03:35 · answer #4 · answered by al 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The American people don't "owe" her anything, especially the presidency. If she doesn't like the job, and isn't satisfied sucking at the public trough as Senator, let her quit and start her own private practice.
2007-01-22 05:00:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anji 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WE dont owe her anything. What the hell is he talking about. Just another reason not to vote for this woman. I think her and her husband owe us for their joke of a presidency and the things he failed to do. That and cheating on his wife in the white house. What we owe her, is not to vote for her and keep power out of her hands.
2007-01-22 05:03:33 · answer #6 · answered by Bucfan 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. No one is owed anything in life. What you get out of life is what you put into it-- not because of who you are, what you gave up, what kind of childhood you have, or what your race is. I especially hate when anyone, none the less Hilary Clinton, use this card to get what they want. To me, it's an easy way out, a way to try to get what you want without having to work for it. This comment makes me want to puke!
2007-01-22 05:00:40 · answer #7 · answered by RzrLens 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Politicians need to earn their keep each and every moment. Nobody is "Owed" anything.
But H. Clinton TALKED about health care reform and the rates went down. That is leadership.
2007-01-22 05:01:54 · answer #8 · answered by Whoa_Phat 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
First authorities representative to be stuck at each and every of the above. all of them aren't any further any merely than the different. He become merely careless and were given stuck. He become also black mailed over it for over 2 yrs earlier to it turning out to be public. And to keep her yet "Monica performed the innocuous that she wasn't and were given paid" who paid her and why? She become employed as an "intern" for the white abode. What area did she play in this? How a lot extra information did she bypass round and who were given it? And the "criminal protection fund" become continuously there. that's in user-friendly words publicly widely used now because they had to tap into it. The criminal fund become set up round 1914 less than yet another call noted as the familiar public protection software. It become executed via conflict and were worried about having a chief no longer having the flexibility to guard his judgements if he become adverse in his judgements on the challenge of conflict and fiscal adjustments on the grounds that there have been adjustments in Presidents and political leaders in the course of the Spanish American conflict - WW1 - WW2. And by technique of ways does all of us keep in innovations NIXON? How did he pay for his legal specialists? protection fund - duh. How do you imagine Bush Sr. were given a lot crap stirred up and then become able to sparkling his slate and not in any respect one among his acquaintances and collegues went adverse to them - pay will improve in the course of the third 3 hundred and sixty 5 days in workplace - type of like Hush money. He also exceeded various charges that were no longer going to be exceeded except they agreed with him on the "Dessert typhoon" skirmish (police act - Marshaling protecting tactic they noted as it). Please human beings, you want to crucify one at the same time as all them are merely as accountable or extra so. He become merely no longer as sneaky as some thing else. Why do you imagine Hustler is providing a reward for all of us to get evidence on any White abode authentic or Federal abode authentic with dirty laundry to air? To me it merely seems Clinton become duped clone of JFK. merely this time they did no longer have him killed. issues that make you bypass Hmmmmmmmm.....
2016-12-02 21:45:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They seem to have reached a mutually acceptable, political equivalent of a rotating, biological host/parasite relationship with each other
2007-01-22 05:09:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋