Why do true CHRISTIANS not need legislation for or against ABORTION.
2007-01-22 04:49:27 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Sorry for being thick - but I don't understand the question!
2007-01-22 04:52:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
For a start when the Bible was written people were smart enough to use birth control.
Another fact is child mortality was so high before 1900 that any child that lived was greatly appreciated.
Do we need laws to enforce civility? As long as the world has law breakers. Something must be done to the unarmed.
I believe abortion is murder. and the real victim is the woman that becomes a murderer. It will change her life until she dies.
Meanwhile the in most cases the father is clueless but he got laid.
Go big Red Go
2007-01-22 05:35:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't know, but I disagree with you, at least in political theory. Obviously, the law is not our conscience, so Christians do not need to get abortions.
But in political theory, our government is a Constitutional one. And Roe v. Wade was radical judicial legislation, which subverted State's Rights, under the 10th Amendment. If you think this is not a big deal, consider the Civil War.
And remember the slippery slope argument: Today abortion is legal. If no one fights it, next it will be manditory. And after that euthenasia will become legal. And after that, euthenasia will be manditory.
Muse, that is no Christian dogma I've ever heard. Might be Catholic.
2007-01-22 04:54:17 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
first of all, please do no longer lump all the pro-decision human beings in with one guy or woman. certainly, what Roe vs. Wade did replaced into interpret the form. the ultimate to privateness replaced into the controversy. and that they desperate that with wellness care professional/affected person privilege, no regulation ought to require a contravention of that privilege. So in effect, each and every state had to re-pass to their rules and lead them to constitutional. They did no forcing of any regulation, or overstepping any bounds. Their job using fact the acceptable courtroom is to be the marvelous "interpretation" of the US shape. each and every guy or woman has the ultimate to allure all the thank you to the acceptable courtroom for his or her situations, yet no longer all are heard. This one replaced into chosen, and that they did their job. So i wish that explains issues to you. they did no longer "tension" something in the way you deem it on your question. It replaced into purely the states had no rules against abortion, so as they had to maintain on with Roe v. Wade till they did make certain if it replaced into criminal of their state or no longer and for how long it may be allowed. See? i'm professional-decision, and there are no own assaults right here. I wish all and sundry ought to intelligently debate a query without own assaults. . .
2016-11-01 00:04:31 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Okay, purely on Christian dogma.
Two people stand at the pearly-gates. One person tells St. Peter she didn't have an abortion because she felt in her heart it was wrong. The other said she didn't have one because it was illegal.
Which one was righteous?
According to Christian dogma, earth is where the wheat is separated from the chaff. People must be free to make moral decisions here on earth and prove themselves righteous.
2007-01-22 05:09:55 · answer #5 · answered by Overt Operative 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
well if by true christian you mean fundamentalists, then its because they want everything done their way, with no other discussion, no other opinion, no other outside influence. everything must be done on their beliefs, because everybody else is wrong in their view. they feel they know what is best for everybody else in the world, and they are undeniably correct. they want to push their beliefs on everybody else. i feel that if they really dont agree with abortion, dont get one. but you shouldnt tell somebody else they cant because you dont agree with it.
and by the way, the post about the slippery slope theory is crap. it isnt a theory...its called the slippery slope fallacy, meaning false. just because one thing happens does not signal others will happen as well.
2007-01-22 05:15:39 · answer #6 · answered by 2010 CWS Champs! 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Im a Christian. Christians dont need legislation to be against abortion, but the USA does. We are a nation of law. I think they will redo this case, because of scientific evidence that disproves the Roev.Wade decision.
2007-01-22 04:53:14 · answer #7 · answered by Daniel 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
well, i dont understand your question, but here is my opinion.
its not about religion. its about killing. we have to protect the defenseless. what will be our next step, our big triumph for mankind? kill the old and sick because, well, they have no family and no one wants to take care of them and besides, they take up good money we could use on other things. kill the mentally ill or retarded because they use up good money and they wont know the difference any way. it is the beginning of a domino effect. where will it end? when they come for you because you have green eyes or brown hair?
2007-01-22 05:01:23 · answer #8 · answered by Buk (Fey) 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is no debate except from those who's delusional religious views make souls pop into existence at the moment of conception.
2007-01-22 04:58:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because it is the world's problem and we are not part of this world. Let them have the endless arguments about woman's rights or baby's rights or whatever else is out there.
2007-01-22 04:52:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Christians will not be happy until they can subvert the government into enforcing religious doctrine as theocratic law.
Abortion is just one of the religious doctrines they want the government to enforce as theocratic law.
2007-01-22 04:56:16 · answer #11 · answered by sprcpt 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋