English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It is crystel clear that Pakistani Generals & ISI are not only encourging but sponsoring Talibans (Pakistani commandos) to bleed NATO and ANA forces in Afghanistan. Iranians and Arabs have made Afghanistan a battle-field through Pakistan to acheive their own goals to
make WMD and jointly destroy NATO and then destroy not only Israel but also the other weak nations and ethnic groups in middle east and south asia.

If EU and United States and other democratic forces of the world are defeated and are replaced by China, Iran, Pakistan and other fascist States, this world shall be a hell.

After 9/11, United States punished terrorists by expelling Talibans (Pakistan) from Afghanistan. Why Afghanistan, NATO and the whole world is silent and not punish Pakistan who is determined to divide Afghanistan between Pakistan and Iran? Why not understand that
destruction of Pakistan is the survival of Afghanistan and the victory of freedom & democracy all over the world.

2007-01-22 04:27:19 · 5 answers · asked by Akhter Jan Mengal, Balochistan. 1 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

5 answers

Assuming you are right what action would a weak fractured nearly unarmed Afghanistan take against the nuclear armed Pakistan?

Afghnistan could take it's case to the UN but what would the UN do? Pakistan vehemently denies all accusations against it and would defend itself in the world body.

Surely you're not suggesting that the EU and NATO are going to attack Pakistan? If they did then you would see what hell on earth really is.

2007-01-22 04:39:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This one is a sticky situation. Pakistan has worn two hats for a while. One being a nation that has assisted the U.S.A. by furnishing good intelligence on the Al Queda in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The other side is where Pakistan seems to allow the Al Queda to move relatively unfettered between the two countries. Obviously, there are factions in Pakistan that are pro-western and those that are Pro-Taliban.

Afghanistan is not strong enough militarily to invade Pakistan and the U.S.A. would not support or allow such an action any way. I think the solution is to make Afghanistan strong enough to protect its borders. As usual, it will probably fall to the U.S.A. to furnish the money and materiel to accomplish this.

2007-01-22 04:38:32 · answer #2 · answered by Michael C 2 · 0 0

The United Nations is doing the same thing the League of Nations did in the 1930s: NOTHING.

Don't forget North Korea; they have shown the world they have a bomb and still nothing. I am starting to believe that this is the 'end of the west', as many political pundits are saying.

I agree with the poster after me. Saudi Arabia is also afraid of the radicals and the democracy movement in their country. So they try not to anger anybody.

2007-01-22 04:35:51 · answer #3 · answered by robert2020 6 · 0 0

it type of feels that the individuals are hell bent upon starting to be yet another similar situation as they did interior the previous due 1970's in Iran, their staunchest best pal in Asia and now Pakistan yet another staunch best pal is being pushed adversarial to the wall to strive against American conflict on it is soil.a majority of those terrorists are a CIA created,educated,armed & financed communities, they were "good" boys see you later as they killed the Soviets and undesirable boys at the same time as they grew to change into their guns to their masters ! What an underestimation. i'm between the very professional-American Pakistani's yet when the U. S. were to attack my united states of america I assure you that I will be amoungst the first to change right into a suicide bomber adversarial to them.

2016-10-15 22:44:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because the US won't let them. The last thing Bush wants is a war between 2 of his "allies" in the Mideast even if Bin Laden is hiding in Pakistan.

2007-01-22 04:31:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers