Why do so few of the most vocal conservatives on this forum ever have anything to say about her voting record or her intelligence or anything actually relevent?
Are conservatives suggesting that being good looking is the only quality they care about in a leader? Or is it just fear?
2007-01-22 04:21:33 · 19 answers · asked by Steve 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hillary Clinton has been a public figure for a long time. During her husband's Presidency, her life was turned inside out and all the dirty laundry aired at the same time his was. It's hard to come up with anything new on her, so, her detractors are reduced to belittling her looks, and taking shots at her marriage. In a country so obsessed with physical appearance, their snide comments find fertile ground among those desperate for anything with which to disparage her. Going after her on the issues might backfire if people start actually thinking about them seriously, so...
I keep hearing nasty comments about Nancy Pelosi's appearance, also. It's really unfortunate that so many Americans have a mentality that encourages this kind of abuse. I guess I shouldn't be surprised; the popularity of entertainment like 'American Idol' demonstrates the mindset all too well. Fortunately, women like Hillary Clinton are not likely to be stopped by this kind of idiocy.
2007-01-22 04:57:22 · answer #1 · answered by functionary01 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, I honestly don't trust her and don't like her stand on several issues.
But, let's look at this from another perspective.
If you knew your husband was a womanizer, and that fact became public, would you continue to stay with him?
I submit to you the only reason they are still together is because of her own political aspirations. And because of Bill's past transgressions (possibly current), I doubt they are intimate.
We'll never know.
I really don't care what the President looks like so long as they can lead. That's the President's job.
2007-01-22 12:30:14 · answer #2 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Her voting record is that of an extreme liberal. She was entirely liberal until becoming the Senator of NY. She opposes the war ideologically, but since a good portion of her NY constituents and donators to her campaign and fundraisers are in favor of the war since it helped with Israeli security she has to also be in favor of it.
Her socialist views are abhorent enough, but waffling on an issue she is fundamentally against just makes her a typical hypocritical politician. And that inability to take a stand is what indicates she is not a strong leader. Just another politician playing the polls instead of doing what she feels is right.
2007-01-22 12:29:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Much of the RedsState agenda is based on closet sexuality, and moral highground.
Hillary is a conundrum she is neither in or out of the closet a kept boy or a buggerer.. She is a woman.
Go big Red Go
2007-01-22 12:34:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am a conservative and don't care about her looks or her sexuality (whatever is meant by that). I simply don't think she would be a good president, I believe I do still have that right.
2007-01-22 12:43:28 · answer #5 · answered by rosi l 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Her voting record is a joke? I am not AFRAID of her, but her agenda is a different story. I would easily believe she would like us to be like HUGO CHAVAZ (Spelling??) who closed down all political enemies. do not be afraid of the not loved politicians for they are closely watched . Watch out for the one even the media loves for that means even the "watchdos" is asleep. that is when everyone should fear.
2007-01-22 12:59:56 · answer #6 · answered by ALunaticFriend 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hmmm... as compared to all the mature liberal comments about Bush? You're faux outrage makes me laugh. You people are such hypocrites.
I don't care what that marxist criminal looks like - she's corrupt and unworthy of the presidency. Period.
2007-01-22 12:42:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
She has an abysmal voting record. There you go.
People focus on her sexuality because there is a genuine question as to whether her marriage to Bill is a sham marriage for political purposes only. I think she completely asexual.
2007-01-22 12:26:22 · answer #8 · answered by halfway 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Have I missed something here? Did she have plastic surgery and announce Rosie O'Donnell as her running mate? My tv has been out since saturday.
2007-01-22 12:39:34 · answer #9 · answered by old painter 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Most of the serious conservative comments seem to attack her socialist agenda , not her looks...
2007-01-22 12:32:08 · answer #10 · answered by bereal1 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋