what really happend on 9/11?

Question

do you guys think 9/11 was caused by terrorists, or was it a mastermind plan by president bush so he could get support to invade iraq

Answer 1

What really happened? 4 planes got hijacked by terrorists.

Two hit the World trade center, where my cousin was killed.

One hit The Pentagon, half a mile from my hotel that I work at. Two of my clients who work there were injured but survived.

That plane flew over my hotel - two engineers working on the roof actually saw it.

It was terrorists, not our own government.

Answer 2

Good question. From everything I know, here it is:
Pilots trained in Florida, took aircraft in the busiest and most closely monitored air corridor in the country and flew them for 15 minutes in a no-fly zone twice with no Air Force response.
The mastermind is a former US allie angry about being lied to in Afghanistan.
The Bin Ladens, who maintained Texas residences, were allowed to leave the country without questioning.
The Bushes are very chummy with many members of the Saudi oil community, but have never pressed any of them, including Bin Laden relatives, for the whereabouts of the man blamed by most for killing 3000 Americans in New York City.
Like the Kennedy Assassination, the whole thing stinks.
Something only a pro-torture president could be part of.

Answer 3

it could have been blamed on Russia, each and everything replaced into blamed on Russia or Communists in many situations. as a remember of certainty, i do no longer think of alternative than terrorism aimed promptly at Israel, there replaced into lots Arab terrorism till the late 1960's, after the 6 Day conflict, and on a international scale till the Munich Olympic bloodbath in Sept. 1972. yet i think of any style of attack on US soil interior the 1950's or early 60's theory to have come from someplace else might have led to a nuclear strike against the Soviet Union and it relatively is allies, which of direction might have meant none human beings may be right here debating it. definite, there have been fewer crimes on the line, even though it replaced into in contrast to there replaced into no crime. There additionally replaced into no longer 24/7 information, so relatively some crimes and issues weren't pronounced interior the clicking. Rapes, to illustrate weren't pronounced for the main area on television information from what I understand. And the US and SOviet Union have been consistently in a state that any 2nd the button must be pushed. i replaced into purely 5 while Sputnik replaced into released, yet nevertheless I understood some grown-united statesthought this replaced into going to recommend conflict. In some techniques it replaced into safer and a few techniques it replaced into greater risky.

Answer 4

Bush administration (and family). Duhbya isn't smart enough to come up with this by himself. Just a few of hundreds of fishy things about the 9/11 attacks:

1) Read "Operation Northwoods", the US government's formerly classified plans to develop a "terror campaign" to CREATE an "apparent threat to peace in the Western hemisphere" in 1962. Page 10 describes how to FAKE an attack using a commercial plane so to TRICK the public into supporting military action on Cuba/Castro. (Just for fun, pretend it says Iraq/Hussein or Afghanistan/bin Laden wherever it says Cuba/Castro, and see if anything sounds familiar.)

2) Note that Saddam Hussein was NOT tried for anything related to 9/11. Consider how much MORE money and effort was put into finding, trying, and executing HIM than in tracking down Osama bin Laden, who was allegedly responsible.

3) The man in the infamous needle-in-a-haystack "confession" tape is clearly NOT Osama bin Laden - compare with the FBI's own photos and description and see. The 9/11 attacks are not even mentioned in the FBI's Wanted poster for him. George W. Bush stated that he was "not concerned" about bin Laden because HE KNOWS that Osama had nothing to do with it, and that the U.S. already had plans for invading the Middle East as of 9/9/01, two days BEFORE the faked attacks.

4) WHY, when Bush's scheduled appearance at an elementary school on 9/11/01 had been well-publicized, didn't the Secret Service evacuate hundreds of innocent children to safety, and whisk him away to an unknown, secure location IMMEDIATELY, if the U.S. was TRULY under attack by foreign terrorists. THREE allegedly suspicious incidents involving Middle Easterners threatening Bush were reported in the Florida town where he was staying on 9/10/01, yet instead of being rushed to safety, he continued his visit with the children (rendering him unavailable to make defensive decisions that only the President can make), and then gave a press conference at EXACTLY the time and place he was previously SCHEDULED to be. When his plane finally left Florida over a half-hour later, there was still NO military security escort. Isn't the President supposed to be protected at all costs in the event of a REAL attack on the nation? Shouldn't the schoolchildren have at least been made less of a target?

5) How did a piece of PAPER from inside the clothing of a man who was allegedly on a plane that EXPLODED in a fireball that was supposedly hot enough to vaporize the entire plane AND destroy a steel skyscraper, just happen to float out safely UNSINGED? Isn't it a little too convenient that similar items were miraculously found at the other crash sites, where the planes also mysteriously vaporized, unlike other plane crashes?

6) Larry Silverstein leased the money-pit WTC buildings just 6 weeks before 9/11, and protected them with several insurance policies that would pay out over $7 billion in the event of TWO destructive incidents (convenient, huh?!). Several requests for permits to demolish the buildings had been denied because they were full of asbestos. Fortunately, Silverstein had just negotiated the right to rebuild them in the event they were destroyed.

7) WTC7, another Silverstein property insured for hundreds of millions, was only the 3rd steel frame skyscraper in history to collapse due to a fire that didn't burn hot enough to actually melt steel (WTC 1 & 2 were the first two - other steel buildings with significantly larger and longer fires remain standing). In 2005, Silverstein admitted to having approved the controlled demolition of WTC7, which occured just hours after the attacks. WHEN did demolitions experts SET those charges throughout the building that day (amidst the carnage and rescue efforts), and wasn't it a bit risky to send people in to place explosives if there were lethal fires burning inside it? Why doesn't the offcial report on 9/11 mention the destruction of WTC7?

Answer 5

It probably was the Arab guys that were on the planes, but you know how some people sometimes loose it after a tragedy like that, maybe Bush just couldn't handle it and made the wrong decisions.

Answer 6

It was definitely the Taliban, led by Osama Bin-Laden. Seriously, President Bush doesn't exactly fit the bill for "evil mastermind".

Answer 7

Using President Bush and Mastermind in the same sentence is comical,...to say the least.....so excuse me while,,ILMAO..... ...Hahahahahaha

Answer 8

The US was attacked by islamists and the war on terror began. Pretty simple actually.

I also ate Burger King that day. Stomach ache.

Answer 9

You could tell that Bush was expecting it because when he was told about it he did nothing but continued to read "See Spot Run" to the children.

He didn't even have a look of surprise on his face.

.

Answer 10

There is no true evidence to base this on. There are enough anti-Bush world leaders who would be promoting it if there was.