Do you think with the advancement in technology today that the porn industry can make digital child porn. That way they actual kids wont be used in production of such movies. Because sick as it may be, the demand is always gonna be there, so why not use technology and hopefully you satisfy the demand and at the same time keep the kids safe???
2007-01-22 02:42:37 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
You guys are so stupid, just cause I asked about child porn doesnt mean I support it. You bunch of **** juggling idiots.
2007-01-22 17:06:06 · update #1
Regaurdless of how sick i personally think that child pornography is~ it makes sense~ usuing digital images may work~ unfortunitly if it is found out by the government, how can they deal with it. i think you really have an idea going there but hopefully it wont be needed~ porn is one thing but usuing innocent children is just appauling~ some people are just sick~ But i hope that maybe things wil change~ good thinking~
2007-01-22 02:49:18 · answer #1 · answered by Chrybaby 2 · 1⤊ 20⤋
Ironically i actually did a paper on this. The problem many people have with digital kiddie porn is that it can often times intice pediphiles, sort of wet the appetite as it were, so they want to go out and find a kid.
Also the digital stuff can blur the line and make it harder to prosecute real life child pornographers. Is that really a 12 year old or is it an 18 year old digitally enhanced to look like a 12 year old?
Then there are also those freaks who will only be satisfied by the real thing, if they know its a digital image they just wont be turned on by it.
Also kiddie porn is often used by pedophiles to normalize the behavior when seducing children (ie...look at this movie see all the kids are doing it)
Its a really complicated issue. But you can probably argue that many people would choose the legal option (digital images) as opposed to finding real kids and risk going to jail.
2007-01-22 02:50:54 · answer #2 · answered by Courtney C 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The only plus to this idea is that it doesn't 'initially' involve children. Lock them up with each other and leave them there. Unfortunately child predators has received support and protection from liberals in the legal system and also from various organizations. A prime example of this is the Catholic Church who have by their protection of child predators encouraged and promoted those activities.
2007-01-22 02:54:53 · answer #3 · answered by dano 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Even digitalized child porn is illegal. Whatever depicts the image of a child under the age of 18 is against the law and if you are caught with it, you will be prosecuted and jailed.
So, drawings, of adults having sex with children would be called child porn. Be careful where you tread, or you could end up in a cell with Bruno and be the playmate of the month.
2007-01-22 02:49:15 · answer #4 · answered by Dave 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I think any person or company that would produce this kind of crap should be brought up on charges and locked away. Child porn is the worst type of crime (in my opinion) and should not, ever, be produced whether real or not.
2007-01-22 02:53:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why don't the sick perverts just realize something has to be wrong with them self if they find a child sexually attracted, and go get some help to cope with there perversions?
2007-01-22 02:49:23 · answer #6 · answered by ♥ Becky ♥ 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the problem is the desire becomes stronger the need for it to be MORE real -this is an illness
its not fun and games i was a victim and its not a matter of pleasuring theses freaks its about the children there should be no ideal of how to make it safe ...........
2007-01-22 02:47:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes I see what you are saying but the fact stands that even though they might get their fill from watching this, that does not fill their need to do it, in which case children will still be in danger.
2007-01-22 02:47:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
They probably do, but I would think that eventually pedophiles still would want the real thing...and that means that kids still wouldn't be safe.
2007-01-22 02:49:05 · answer #9 · answered by Survivors Ready? 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That would still be equally disturbing. The fact that people get turned on by child pornography is sickening.
2007-01-22 02:46:29 · answer #10 · answered by Seven Costanza 5 · 10⤊ 0⤋
We should be hanging people who look at this garbage, not making it easier for them to get their rocks off.
2007-01-22 02:47:07 · answer #11 · answered by Jersey Giant 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋