You saw a marvellous painting . do you deny its painter just because you dont see him?
Do you deny the radio waves, electricity just because you dont see them?
How come one deny God just because he has not seen him?
2007-01-22 02:35:01 · 11 answers · asked by ? 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Enceladus ;
Put your feelings ( anger, love, e.t.c.) on the desk , give me evidence you have one of them..
As you said, it is faith, if you had seen God, it would not be faith any more.
Eye sees the art, mind sees the artist.
God is seen with the "mind eye"
have a nice day
2007-01-22 02:50:26 · update #1
I SO knew what you were getting at and I agree.
2007-01-22 02:42:17 · answer #1 · answered by AKA FrogButt 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because there's evidence that a painting was painted by the painter. There's evidence of radio waves and electricity. There is no evidence of God. The existence of God can only be found through faith. Existence of painters, radio waves and electricity are found through evidence.
2007-01-22 10:40:03 · answer #2 · answered by Enceladus 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
One can deny god because there are other explanations for why things are here. Just like if there is a painting that is supposedly painted by leonardo, but someone brings up that it may have been painted by Rapheal. All of a sudden there is reason to make a decision. The next thing you should do is make a rational choice. you decide which that is. I know I have made mine.
2007-01-22 10:39:39 · answer #3 · answered by slov72 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Logic tells us that if a painting exists, someone must have created it.
Logic tells us that if we are hearing the sound, then the radio waves are being transmitted in some fashion.
However, Logic does not tell us that just because we exist, that God does, too. There is too much evidence to support the natural evolution of things, not the instantaneous creation of them that most claim God provided.
2007-01-22 10:39:42 · answer #4 · answered by Critter Lady 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I deny God because there has not been enough facts presented to me that prove his existence. And, until that happens, he does not exist in my eyes.
2007-01-22 10:39:26 · answer #5 · answered by Seven Costanza 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In that case ghosts, leprachauns, two headed dildo monsters from out of space can't be denied just because we don't see em.
2007-01-22 10:39:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No I don't think it is logical. Thank God I believe in HIM.
2007-01-22 10:38:19 · answer #7 · answered by feather 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You're right! I haven't seen you, but I believe you're out there somewhere.
2007-01-22 10:38:46 · answer #8 · answered by Jasmine 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why do people insist there IS one when they don't see him? You believe what you believe.
2007-01-22 10:38:26 · answer #9 · answered by Jess H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree
2007-01-22 10:38:00 · answer #10 · answered by Leveler 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋