Bush has made Iraq so unstable that the Iraqis are being killed at more than double the rate that Saddam was killing them.
2007-01-22 01:42:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥ Cassie ♥ 5
·
3⤊
9⤋
Look up the definition of war and you will find, people die. The good, the innocent and the bad. Bush, in an effort to limit the number of innocent people getting killed, has tied the hands of our troops.
Good thing you were not around spouting your liberal propaganda during World War 2 when the Allies were carpet bombing Berlin, Dresden and many other cities. Some local citizens would bring a short rope and a tall tree and watch you swing cause back then, it was anti American and pro Nazi.
Many of these people you claim Bush killed, were killed by terrorists and their car bombs and suicide bombers which, are not under control of President Bush.
Try again, you still are not going to make your point, no matter how stupid it is, that Bush is the cause of all the world troubles. Look at the nut cases in North Korea, Iran, Venezuela just to name a few. These are the people responsible for all the world tensions, not Bush and Not Clinton or any other American President.
2007-01-22 01:45:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by bigmikejones 5
·
5⤊
3⤋
Bush's invasion of Iraq might wind up resulting in more dearhs that Saddam was responsible for.
The USA supported Saddam's War against IRAN so our nation is already partially guilty in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iranians.
We are a terrorist nation our terror is just more organized.
Both LBJ and Nixon should have been hanged for their involvment in the Vietnam War..by the American people.
American Presidents get a free pass on death and destruction...this is nothing new
2007-01-22 01:50:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
If George Bush used nerve gas on Los Angeles, then he'd be a terrorist.
Hussein was an unelected tyrant who killed dissenters and funded groups that engaged in the willful and targeted kiling of innocents. When one of our soldiers kills an innocent on purpose, they are charged with murder. Maybe you've seen the headlines?
If there's a parrallel between Bush and any terrorist leaders, it is this, that he continues to send money to groups that are uncomfortably close to terrorists, such as the Palistinians.
2007-01-22 01:45:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by MithrilHawk 4
·
6⤊
3⤋
Saddam signed DeathWarrants....participated in the deaths......
President Bush is ending that sort of Terrorism. He has killed no one...he has orderd no one's death.
Dam, you Libs are so Myoptic so Stooooopid
2007-01-22 01:48:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by PoliticallyIncorrect 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
You have to be an enemy of the state to think like that. Or maybe ignorant and don't know the different between one or the other. or maybe a pro Saddam and clan. In other words you are a.........!!
2007-01-22 01:45:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
I would say innocent civilians need to quit letting terrorists hang out in their civilian neighborhoods.
2007-01-22 01:43:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
2⤋
I see you like to ignore facts and just shout your liberal predjudices. What you say has no semblance of truth.
2007-01-22 02:03:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Actually, 32,000 Iraqi civilians were killed last year alone. Since the onset of this war, tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis--many of them women and children--have been senselessly slaughtered.
2007-01-22 01:48:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Hemingway 4
·
1⤊
5⤋
so called?
sucide bombers are so called
hiding master mind for the Klingoffer killers is so called
the explosive expert on the 1st WTC attack went to Iraq is so called terrorist.
Let me guess you think 9/11 was so called terrorist attack too.
Wake up we are at war with Muslim terrorist.
2007-01-22 01:44:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
3⤋
Terrorists agree with you.
Terrorists call Bush a terrorist, too.
Traitors also call Bush a terrorist.
2007-01-22 01:43:57
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
4⤋