Absolutely NOT! She promised when she became a carpet bagger here in NY that she would NOT run for President. Then after she was elected as a senator, she said she wouldn't run for president the next time (the last presidential elections we had). Now she is running for President.
She rides the coat tails of other government officials and claims to do so much for us here. We really haven't seen much to jump up and cheer for here in Western NY. (For anyone that doesn't know, there is a LOT more to the state than NY City and Albany... Western NY state includes Buffalo and Niagara Falls.) She claims to speak for women... I'm a woman and disagree with a majority of the things she says. Now, if she will be concentrating on running for President, how much will she actually do for us now?
I guess she ticks me off because she came to NY (it seems) because the population/demographics here would seem to give her a good chance at winning whatever she was running for. I don't really like to be used like that.
My 2 cents. I'll get off my soapbox now.
2007-01-21 23:45:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Genie 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Not a chance.
First, like so many have already said, it will be the Bill and Hillary show all over again and we suffered for it the last time.
Next is things like whitewater where they outright lied to us. And of course there is the fact that the whole 9/11 mess could have been averted if they had been doing there jobs instead of whatever they were doing. And we have the trashing of the economy. The Clinton presidency is what allowed the dot-com fiasco and we were in a recession because of it and other things when the Clintons left office. Let's not forget the broken promise about never running for president. obviously a person of high personal standards there. Just they type of upstanding individual we need to run this country!
But the real crucial issue is their obvious contradictions between what they say and what they do. They want to move this country in the direction of socialism for everybody but themselves. If they feel the biggest money makers should contribute the most to the government why aren't they doing so? Sounds an awful lot like elitism to me. A fine example of their attitude is the fact that they felt it was appropriate to steal from the White House and us when they moved out.
I will happily vote for a woman, a black or even a trans sexual with purple polka dots if that person is qualified and demonstrates good principles and the ability to reason rationally. The Bill and Hillary show has done none of the above. You want to crash the economy and invite terrorism, vote for the Clinton clan again.
2007-01-21 23:49:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Nope. She's a ruthless politician with lots of skeletons. Remember Whitewater? The reason nothing ever turned up in the investigation is that all the folks who knew "too much" have mysteriously DIED.
Hmmmmm....
2007-01-21 23:55:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I am. She's highly intelligent, a Yale grad and has done more for NY State in a few short years than the deadbeats who have been there forever. The people who have nothing more constructive to say than calling her a lesbian will hopefully stay away from the polls.
2007-01-21 23:47:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Debra D 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes I will vote for her if she is the Democratic nominee, that's because I have vowed never to vote for a repuglican for anything ever again. George Bush has fixed that for lots of people.
2007-01-21 23:46:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
No. I think it's the general concept of "The Hill and Bill Show." I think they are part of the fire that feeds the opinion of crooked politics. In the Constitution it prohibits people that hold office to make profit from it. Hill and Bill are the masters of that. Sad to say, part of it is the authorities such as the FBI allowing it to take place... Kenneth Starr is still around so it will be interesting if they do regain power... God help us...
2007-01-21 23:37:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
No way. She's a flip-flopper and two-faced. She will say anything to get elected but will then reneg on what she promises. Furthermore, she is too far left for my vote. She says she is a moderate. Bull! She recently voted to give Free social security to illegal immigrants. This is radically left. No, I won't vote for her and if there is no one better to vote for then I won't vote at all.
2007-01-21 23:38:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
Most Dems will say yes at first, then they will vote realisticly.
2007-01-21 23:36:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by americanmalearlington 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Hillary:
Love her
Hate her
(Check one)
me? i wouldn't vote for her, she doesn't have the administrative experience necessary....she may talk a good line, but can't lead
2007-01-21 23:32:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by an_articulate_soul 4
·
0⤊
4⤋
no not in a million years.she is nothing but a middle man for billy boy.
2007-01-21 23:32:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by duc602 7
·
0⤊
3⤋