It all comes down to this...Colts vs. Bears?

Question

Okay I'll admit, I am a huge huge huge Colts fan. However, I don't know much or really paid attention to the Bears' season. I heard they have a great team. Colts played great in the second half last night.

So who do you all think is going to win the Super Bowl?

Indianapolis Colts

or

Chicago Bears?

Answer 1

Go Bears!

Answer 2

Whoo Hooo The Bears!

Answer 3

Colts...they have a better offense and the team that scores the most points wins.

Answer 4

"and FYI, replica and pasting a listing of "popular" atheists off of wikipedia or another liberal website, isn't seen an project" You propose like you purely did? when you'll be a hypocrite about each little thing then why are even asking this? you recognize okay that there are a selection of Atheists that were effectual interior the previous. in case you do not then you are an rather ignorant human being. how are you going to assert that Richard Dawkins doesn't count number at the same time as he's had fulfillment in promoting his books? you're purely canceling him out because you recognize he's an Atheist AND effectual. There are 1000's, likely tens of millions, of Atheists who've effectual jobs and a effectual existence. Dan Barker, various one Atheist in u . s . of america, is in cost of Freethought Radio and the liberty From faith starting up. He attends conventions global and makes speeches. He has recorded over 2 hundred songs, performs the piano, and is a effectual, chuffed, man or woman. Any music artists that are Atheists were effectual. Any artists that are Atheists were effectual. Any engineers or marines or scientists or computing gadget softward programmers are effectual. Jodie Foster is an atheist. She's executed exceedingly properly interior the performing corporation, I shall say. So are different actors like Jack Nicholson, Hugh Laurie, and Katharine Hepburn. Larry King is Agnostic. who's to assert that he's not effectual? Or Charles Darwin? Mark Twain? Sigmund Freud? you may sit down there and are available up with each and each of the excuses that you want, like you're patently doing every time someone mentions effectual Atheists or Agnostics (and larger than in all probability you'll do a reminiscent of me), even though it doesn't erase the very shown actuality that there have been effectual human beings, in heritage and in on the prompt's modern society. "I obviously reported no replica and pasting. Plus, i have not even heard of 80% of the human beings on that record. For all i understand you'd be making the finished element up." Ah, so that you'll be able to replica and paste Theists yet others won't be able to replica and paste Atheists, it particularly is, through the way, what you needed? you're making no experience. you want solutions and at the same time as human beings supply them to you, you declare the "i have under no circumstances heard of them" argument. generic. you're purely right here to commence an project and win. yet you gained't enable all of us supply a probability to jot down previously you bypass off on how incorrect they're. And 0.5 of it is because you do not agree. you're purely a whiner.

Answer 5

The Colts 17-10 because it is finally their year!!!!!!!

Answer 6

Should be an outstanding game. Both teams are motivated and have great players and leaders. My prediction:

Colts 32
Bears 28

Answer 7

Colts all the way!

Answer 8

It's the bears year to win. 21 years has been long enough!!

GO BEARS!!!!!!!!!!1

Answer 9

Colts 31 Bears 14

I bet I'm a BIGGER Colt fan than you! I'm still in shock they are there...THANK GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 10

goooooooo bears