I do know that the vital ingredience is eloquence but I have come to the conclusion that one of the main reasons our leaders fail to fulfil their promise(s) is directly connected to the fact that their speeches (that we put our faith in) are not original and logicaly thinking, no one can implement anothers thoughts as well as the thinker would. I appreciate that our leaders do have a level of input in the direction and aim (bullet points to be covered perhaps) of the speech but it would go without saying that the speech writer uses their discretion to a huge extent. How would you say these relates to our leaders' failure in effecting promises? I feel that an original thought and intent put across by the thinker allows instant flexibility and coherent clarification and perhaps the reason our leaders' responses seem ambiguous under scrutiny/ pressure is directly linked to the lack of originality in their first doctored response. Does this line of thought seem logical? Discuss please.
2007-01-21
23:10:59
·
3 answers
·
asked by
kahahius
3
in
Social Science
➔ Psychology
There is no blame here just a search for the best way forward. Yes. A speech writer is an employee and has no control over the outcome of their script. What should change to bring about a form of accountability as this can be deemed as abuse of public trust?
2007-01-22
07:52:22 ·
update #1