English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

well?

2007-01-21 23:10:07 · 5 answers · asked by little.clown 2 in News & Events Media & Journalism

5 answers

If't is depicted as appropriate to the situation and a natural part of the scene or ad, I don't see anything wrong with it. We all bathe or shower naked, and yet in our culture we can't show a naked model in a shampoo or soap ad. What's up with that?

On the other hand, if it's used for exploitation or gross purposes, it's better to be avoided.

Simple nudity is natural and usually non-sexual. Let's lighten up on something as ordinary and innocent as bare skin!

2007-01-22 08:14:02 · answer #1 · answered by nudie chick 6 · 1 0

It's offensive when tape excerpts are replayed on "news" shows (i.e. the naughty school teacher) since it's exploitive and done to get attention, not report "news."

Often nudity is intermixed with violence against women which I find very repulsive and bad for society overall.

2007-01-22 11:19:45 · answer #2 · answered by Lake Lover 6 · 0 0

Disgusting.

2007-01-22 08:47:47 · answer #3 · answered by robert m 7 · 0 0

I say, bring it on. It's way better than seeing bloody dismembered bodies.

2007-01-22 08:10:42 · answer #4 · answered by Reo 5 · 2 0

it sucks and should not be allowed

2007-01-22 07:21:28 · answer #5 · answered by auntsid 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers