just out of curiosity.
2007-01-21 22:41:41 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
I like RICHARD. Richard sounds stronger. Lyndon sounds a bit weak. William is nice, too, but since you ask, Richard is cool.
2007-01-22 02:47:45 · answer #1 · answered by Mario 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Richard
2007-01-21 23:02:09 · answer #2 · answered by cutegirlin_tn 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
William and Richard sound good, William is the better of the two. The name Lyndon is just stupid, I can't believe anyone would name a child that.
2007-01-21 22:52:27 · answer #3 · answered by Chris G 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
William
2007-01-22 06:12:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
William
2007-01-21 22:44:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I like Lyndon as is it not a very common name. William sounds a bit like a toff name and Richard is very common.
don't mean to offend anyone.
Good Luck.
2007-01-21 22:45:11 · answer #6 · answered by Missbutterfly:-) 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lyndon is fairly uncommon ..there's a boy in my son;s school called William Williams ..so always keep surnames in mind when naming a child!
2007-01-21 22:45:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It has to be " Lyndon " for me, as it's the name of one of my son's. I named him Lyndon Stuart, I thought the names went well together and he was born in 1965, the name was really unique then. It has become much more popular, over the years
2007-01-24 11:43:52 · answer #8 · answered by Sierra One 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
William could be shortened to Willy and Richard could be shortened to Dick - both unfortunate. Lyndon sounds stuck up and a bit lar di dar. I'd choose the historical names if I had to.
2007-01-23 07:18:54 · answer #9 · answered by JJ88 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I prefer Richard. William is not too bad, but I can't say that I care for Lyndon very much...children will shorten it to Lyn which is a girls name..
2007-01-22 21:28:07 · answer #10 · answered by sarch_uk 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋