2007-01-21 21:19:19 · 7 answers · asked by neerja V 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
Though he is not the match winner,he almost singlehandedly carried WI to a near Victory.He deserves
2007-01-21 22:27:12 · answer #1 · answered by karikalan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Normally Man of the match is awarded to the player of winning team. However, in exceptional cases Man of the Match is awarded to the player of loosing team also. In this case the Man of the Match award was given to Chandraopaul for his exceptional batting as he lead the West Indies Team to near the Mamoth total posted by India, which no one had expected. Otherwise Man of the Match should have been awarded to Saurav Ganguly
2007-01-21 23:27:02 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's wrong about it? You never mentioned any reason that why he should not have been.
He was right choice and it was only because of him that India was on tenterhook all through their bowling even after scoring 338 runs and he almost made it for West Indies.
2007-01-21 21:41:54 · answer #3 · answered by shrimal_sandeep 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i feel that the decision was not so gr8.
in my view, dhoni shud have been the man of the match. 62 off 42 balls was terriffic!!! without those runs, west indians could have easily won the match. his keeping was excellent including stumping lara and getting that catch of bravo....
2007-01-21 23:01:03 · answer #4 · answered by emii_dan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-01-22 17:36:06 · answer #5 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES,
HE WAS THE TOPSCORER 149 NOT OUT
FOLLOWED BY GANGULY'S 98
THE DIFFERENCE WAS PRETTY BIG
2007-01-21 21:42:29 · answer #6 · answered by Msd 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
shall i change my decision..
2007-01-22 06:22:05 · answer #7 · answered by sam 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋