Murder by state? Or a rogue KGB operative answerable to nobody?
2007-01-21 20:01:56 · 17 answers · asked by JOHN 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
who else can kill such a fine critic? it can only be the state.
2007-01-21 20:07:10 · answer #1 · answered by Elcie 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Russians supplied Iran with missile defense weapons to protect Russia's Nuclear investment in Iran
The US and Israel heavily criticized Russia for doing this. One Israeli military official even went to so far as to tell Putin to watch out, as such acts may come back to them......
The spy was an outspoken critic of Putin. The last thing that Putin would need is to have one of his outspoken critics taken out under suspiciously circumstances. As soon as the spy was killed, fingers immediately began pointing at Putin, bringing a dark cloud over his administration.
Who stands to gain the most if the current Russian Admin is taken out?
ISRAEL. They will be able to attack Iran with no worries about a Russian retaliation.
When investigating a crime, the first question that an investigator asks is WHO BENEFITS?
In this case, it's ISRAEL who benefits the most
2007-01-21 21:34:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
in case you have studied slightly historic previous this seems greater like a communist killing then a killing of CIA or Mossad. The Mossad makes use of weapons, explosives. CIA is greater subtile in allied countries (vehicle twist of destiny, "suicide"). Why this form of wierd killing cloth ? As in different situations of communist murdering in the previous, the killing approach is extraordinary yet on purpose. that's a message for others. This message is "look, this is not any twist of destiny or a killing between 2 persons who hate one yet another, dissidents shop your mouth close, we are able to locate you everywhere and kill you". The KGB has a sparkling call however the approaches have not replaced, subtility replaced into in no way KBG's maximum useful function.
2016-10-31 23:34:40 · answer #3 · answered by pour 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It should be investegated by a independent body, if proven it should be filed by the court and the russian government should answer so that there is dueprocess and tried in court.
2007-01-21 21:09:52 · answer #4 · answered by mario t. reoyan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely. I believe it was murder by state.
2007-01-21 20:04:38 · answer #5 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes in fact I think Putan was personally involved.
2007-01-21 20:04:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No.
No.
No.
Most likely Berezovsky or someone that actually had something to gain from it. Who would kill someone when they had nothing to gain and everything to lose - reputation etc?
2007-01-22 14:45:03 · answer #7 · answered by filatovvv 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who in the world knows. Maybe it has some middle eastern connection.
2007-01-21 20:04:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Of course they did. Who else would have done it? The mafia over there had they're chances a long time ago.
2007-01-21 20:03:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's quite possible.
2016-05-11 06:19:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋