As we see in a competitive world a heavy load of school/bookish education in the children from the age of 3-4 years. In my openion its not justifiied and its the voilation of independency of children to enjoyment of his/her childhood. what do you think?
2007-01-21 19:20:36 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Primary & Secondary Education
It has been found that children learn and delveope their learning skills at these ages. If they get in the habit to read and learn it will progress as they grow older. Instead of being airhead and couch potates.
I do believe they can be overloaded, however being exposed to a wide range of information will not cause problems. Some will find they like or have an apditude for certain subjects early.
2007-01-21 19:31:17 · answer #1 · answered by Carl P 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There should not be overload to the children at their age 3 to 5. In my personal openion, we should not send the children to school upto 5 years.
2007-01-22 03:38:53 · answer #2 · answered by jk 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course it is not okay. i mean it is absolutely meaningless burdening the children with so much at a time. left on their own to explore they do it better. parents are not willing to try. i would say montessori way of teaching is the best for the kids. regular methods followed right now gives no time for the kids to play or relax. this leads to psycological problems in kids as young as 4 or 5 years. mounting the pressure of exams, projects and all that in kids not at all justified. i am for the change in the educational pattern in our country.
2007-01-22 06:32:57 · answer #3 · answered by balag 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
experiencing life is the best education there is. At that age, they should be outside soaking up life not stuck inside getting book learning. there's no balance is this country.
2007-01-22 13:40:34 · answer #4 · answered by L. 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
CHANGE REQUIRED IMMEDIATELY.
2007-01-22 06:30:47 · answer #5 · answered by AVANISH JI 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋