Read:Iraq,Afganistan,Somalia,Korea,Vietnam....
2007-01-21 19:17:02 · 20 answers · asked by Truth 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
No it is not. It is one of the best and well respected.
2007-01-21 19:19:57 · answer #1 · answered by Roy Chowdhury Rishin 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No where near the most cruel. Try North Korea's, or just about ANY army in the Third World.
2007-01-21 19:57:17 · answer #2 · answered by Sartoris 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I even have been contained in the lively military for going over 2 many years now. Been throughout, Thailand, Guam, Phil, Germany, Italy, Norway to call some. Infantry is a extraordinary interest yet there are extra jobs which you would be able to pass everywhere contained in the international with. It matter on what you prefer to do interest sensible. i grow to be quartermaster for many of my protection rigidity occupation. The interest that are in each single place are Mechanic, fueler, protection rigidity Intelligence, protection rigidity Police, cook dinner to call some. pass examine in with your locale Recruiter to work out what's open to you. concerning to the lady component in basic terms get in and notice what occurs. that's a enormous international accessible with allot in it which you would be able to do. good success
2016-10-07 13:06:54 · answer #3 · answered by wardwell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lol nice try... I am in the US Army.. There is some "hazing" that goes on that could be considered... Well rough.. At the same time if you have ever seen the way the people are treated in other armies... Well the US is definitely a much friendlier army to its soldiers than other countries are...
2007-01-21 20:24:22 · answer #4 · answered by caleb d 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Join the US Army and then judge for yourself, when you are in the foxholes fighting guerilla warfare and terrorists? Maybe you can make the difference if you think we are too rough on the enemy? But since you asked, unequivacably, empatically no, but mankind as a whole is cruel and insane in war and that is the nature of the beast.
2007-01-21 19:51:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a highly subjective question, which demands the highly subjective answer: No. Not until it takes up practices such as cutting off civilians hands as favoured by certain armies in Algeria.
2007-01-21 19:24:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
no army in the world should be branded as cruel... it is their profession giving their lives for a purpose and taking the lives of enemy...
what do you think about the deed of Taliban, al quaida and that all happened with the citizens of Iraq before military action by US...
2007-01-21 19:43:34 · answer #7 · answered by Harish Jharia 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No any army is designed to slaughter human .If the army is permitted to face civilians the animal instinct nurtured within would arose en mass and do the ha vac against the humans . Read CHENGISKHAN OF MANGOLIA NAZIS IN CONCENTRATION CAMPS
2007-01-21 19:43:39 · answer #8 · answered by e_sivanesan 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nonsense the only land america has asked for after the war's it's fought is a place to bury our dead.
2007-01-22 00:14:44 · answer #9 · answered by Hector 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you want to believe that...
The U.S. Army, Marines, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard are one of the finest group of citizens.
2007-01-21 19:23:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Why to curse the Arrow when the Hunter who released it is rejoicing the cruelty!
2007-01-22 09:31:49 · answer #11 · answered by Shooting stars 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋