2007-01-21 17:09:53 · 7 answers · asked by rostov 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Note please I'm talking about the FATHER not the son, lol.
2007-01-21 17:17:01 · update #1
Not a good one, generally. He was more centrist on many issues than many of those who ran his party, so got little traction without their approval. He ran a bigoted campaign in 1988 that played on less-than-intelligent themes. Was in a tough spot following Reagan, did not have the talent to handle Clinton. Not much of a leader on many critical American issues.
2007-01-21 17:17:40 · answer #1 · answered by Gerry S 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
George H.W. Bush prayed for his son George W's win! Out of all people how can an ex-president wished that a moron like this guy wins re-election. Is iit because Dubya is his son?
That is why I rank HW as low as Dubya.
2007-01-22 02:21:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was not better than Bush, Both love war and killings........ President Bush is following the foot step of his father !!!
2007-01-22 03:13:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a loaded question...prepare for a bunch of ignorant and hateful responses.
2007-01-22 01:14:47 · answer #4 · answered by Appono Astos 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not good, but better than his son
2007-01-22 14:28:08 · answer #5 · answered by cwigg 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well he couldn't have been that great if he was not re-elected. Doesn't mean he was bad just no great impact.
2007-01-22 01:16:23 · answer #6 · answered by wondermom 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A terrible one, maybe worst ever.
2007-01-22 01:14:48 · answer #7 · answered by Dude 13 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋