reference to the answers of my last question.
2007-01-21 16:34:12 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Oh, Hillary no.
2007-01-21 16:37:51 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋
It would be for the better of America, and the world, if capitalism went the way of the dodo.
Rich yuppies drive past homeless people and minimum wage workers in their Land Rovers, on the way to their $500,000 homes. Society in America more closely resembles Europe in the Dark Ages, and the gap is only getting wider.
Imagine a world where everyone was equal, and no one was left to want. You had everything you needed, and wanted no more. Socialism is the way to Utopia, and it should be followed.
2007-01-21 23:14:11 · answer #2 · answered by Jon R 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i didn't catch your last question,but America is already a mix of socialism and capitalism. it has been for many years now.. i'd e-mail you with a question,but would probably get reported. then again i will probably get reported for answering this question. it seems to be the norm.
2007-01-21 16:41:08 · answer #3 · answered by J Q Public 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Libertarianism is a scourge. They are oblivious to the fact that our government was instituted to secure its citizens' god-given rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. A true Libertarian wants to be able to dictate his/her version of "personal responsiblity"; they are tyrants. But, a Libertarian should be in charge of George W. Bush.
2007-01-21 17:25:05 · answer #4 · answered by orderly_logic 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-01-21 16:37:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
some socialist classes could nicely be constructive even though it in no way continues to be that way. as a replace the politicians will continuously shop increasing the quantity a length of socialist classes and in some unspecified time interior the destiny they run out of alternative individuals's funds
2016-10-31 23:24:55 · answer #6 · answered by boddie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A far better mix than the fascist direction we are in now.
2007-01-21 17:06:56 · answer #7 · answered by Frann 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have been mixing them since Ben Franklin organized the first municipal fire department.
Social enterprises are as American and necessary as our limits on free markets (such as anti-trust laws).
2007-01-21 16:43:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
In same cases, we already are. The G8 is proof it is very feasible. The Democrats can get that going.
2007-01-21 16:38:43 · answer #9 · answered by Gerry S 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What do you think Welfare,medicare and medicaid are other than socialism? To name but a few.
2007-01-21 16:37:44 · answer #10 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No why would i want the government more involved with my paycheck. it's bad enough i lose money to social security and medicare.
2007-01-21 16:38:09 · answer #11 · answered by GloryDays49ers 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋