English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What is not unity?
Whatever is not as 'part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, sensation, influence, derivative, origin, condition, rule, intent, and fulfillment' is not unity.

What is not love?
Whatever is not as 'part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, sensation, influence, derivative, origin, condition, rule, intent, and fulfillment' is not love.

What is not atom?
Whatever is not as 'part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, sensation, influence, derivative, origin, condition, rule, intent, and fulfillment' is not atom.

What is not idea?
Whatever is not as 'part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, sensation, influence, derivative, origin, condition, rule, intent, and fulfillment' is not.

What is not God?
Whatever is not as 'part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, sensation, influence, derivative, origin, condition, rule, intent, and fulfillment' is God.
.
.
.
Are these valid questions and answers?

2007-01-21 15:39:09 · 16 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

16 answers

only great philosophers can give you a valid reply to your question.

2007-01-21 18:41:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Ya, it extremely is wordy and chatty as all get-out, yet after wading by each and all of the little tidbits approximately how a lot each and everything costs, and the thank you to get there, and what to do and see in Detroit having no longer something to do with the motor vehicle instruct, and then going returned and reading the respond returned to work out if he truly responded the question, I did discover the word, " ... even though it extremely is easily properly worth seeing..." in there someplace. i do no longer see how that grow to be a sturdy answer, however. Why is it properly worth seeing? the respond could have properly merely mentioned "particular."

2016-11-26 01:22:31 · answer #2 · answered by carle 4 · 0 0

The answer to your question is no. Communicating the question properly may go a long way to having them answered. Rephrase the questions, and ask again. These are not intelligible questions. The cannot even have a reasonable question extrapolated from them.

2007-01-21 16:31:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Nothing you ever ask is worthy of a unity or a part of a fufillment or a condition of anything but crazynes on your part!

Why do you ask questions that NO one understands or gives a squat about.

YOU need to go elsewhere to ask your stupid, totally insane questions.

2007-01-21 16:09:13 · answer #4 · answered by cuttiestrawberypie 2 · 1 0

Yes

2007-01-21 15:48:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I can notice to many part and part by part things u r notifying happening in every human's life. So all above can adopt as valid questions and answers

2007-01-21 15:44:49 · answer #6 · answered by sharon 3 · 0 0

What is you......a part an intent? or a half of a whole. Or a senstaion that gives me the creeps each time you ask one of these questions.
Please tell me that there is only one of you in that brain of yours!


Pleeeeeeeease stop these insane questions.

2007-01-21 15:51:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. You took a question, added the word NOT to it, and then pasted the answer from a dictionary. Be creative, you might surprise yourself.

2007-01-21 15:45:41 · answer #8 · answered by BAnne 7 · 1 0

It is all claptrap, without useful meaning or even intelligibility. Where did you find this drivel?

2007-01-21 15:43:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Valid questions and answers?
Please ask one little question and perhaps someone can answer

2007-01-21 15:47:18 · answer #10 · answered by clcalifornia 7 · 0 0

No I hope you are not a Philospy Major.

2007-01-21 15:44:52 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers