that Hillary Clinton secretly didn't want John Kerry to win in the last election?
The reason I believe this is because it would be easier for her to win an election without having to battle an incumbent.
Thoughts?
2007-01-21 15:26:10 · 6 answers · asked by The Cult of Personality 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
One step further...since a lot of people claim that the President "stole" the election in Ohio, what do you think of the possibility of Hillary Clinton rigging it for him?
2007-01-21 15:33:12 · update #1
1) She didn't want Kerry to win for the reason you gave.
2) Bush Didn't "steal" Ohio. He won Ohio by about as many votes as JFK won the country in 1960.
3) Hillary had nothing to do with Ohio voting.
2007-01-21 16:29:39 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 15⤊ 0⤋
This is very true. after an 8 year term for any party it is easier to get the other party in, however in this case, the good ole boy rules still apply. Other than those who are extremely left will even vote for hillary....no man nor woman in their right mind would vote for her....we had 8 years of her ruining the country before we do not need anymore. And Obama can give it up.....NO one will vote for a Muslim even if he were a former Muslim, the good ole boys will not go there. John Edwards....pfft....after the last election he moved his family from Raleigh NC, to Chapel Hill, where Erskin Bowles is the president of UNC. This was so that he and Bowles could come up with a strategy. Edwards will always be associated with John Kerry, and will not go anywhere.
The Republicans have not really come out with anyone who appears to be a real strong leader....and because of the decisions that Bush has made in his second term may cost the Republicans the white house. I do want ppl to remember this though....if you vote for a 3rd party like the independent party.....you are doing nothing but splitting votes, and basically throwing your vote away.....the are really on ly 2 parties....Republican and Democrats, voting for anyone who is outside either of these parties...well you threw away your vote.
2007-01-21 23:43:09 · answer #2 · answered by mrs_endless 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would agree with you. I'd rather be a Republican against her in the race than a Democrat against her in the primary. She's just plain nasty when it comes to politics. Her and Obama are case in point.
2007-01-21 23:33:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think Hillary could kick kerrys *** back to the great ww1 that is how bad she would bet him
2007-01-21 23:32:49 · answer #4 · answered by bigdogrex 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I bet you're right. Also, she didn't want to run against him because there would be too much competition. She wanted the Democrats to clamor for her but they didn't. She is desperate to win now because her political clock is ticking away.
2007-01-21 23:36:50 · answer #5 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
she will never win anything,including her husbands fidelity.
2007-01-21 23:29:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋