Anyone think Clinton's "in it to win" is ridiculous? Is anyone ever "in it to lose"?

Answer 1

You're right, it is kind of obvious. But it's a slogan. Get over it.

Answer 2

Good Point...how about "In for the American People." She just wants to "win." Win what? The oval office? A chance to make her husband jealous?

Hilary Clinton doesn’t have the experience, in the military or intelligence sectors of our government to be effective in a time when we are fighting a war oversees and conducting a broader “war” on terrorism. Normally, this would not be an impediment, and there have been many good Presidents, with no serious military credentials –– her husband being one of them. However, in order to rectify the quagmire that Bush has got us in, and also to redirect the “War on Terrorism” more effectively, and away from this cowboy/Rambo strategy employed by Bush and his henchmen, requires someone of either military or strategic competence. Hillary might be a stellar policy maker on the domestic front, but right now we need someone who demonstrates mastery of both military tactics and foreign diplomacy.

Answer 3

John Kerry seemed to be in it to lose. Al Gore too. I just love how AFTER the elections are over they finally decide to take a liberal stand on something while DURING the actual campaign they say nothing.

Answer 4

I am not a Hill fan, but it is not ridculous.

Does Chris Dodd of CT. really think he has a snowball's chance in Hell of winning? I doubt it. It is all part of an ego trip for some.

Answer 5

That is in reference to many on the right trying to suggest liberal Democrats want the US to lose!!
Have you not seen many of the posts today suggesting that very sentiment?
No one wants the US to lose anything!
We are just as Patriotic as you are!
We just have a different way to approach it!!

Answer 6

Well I can tell you this.....this is one vote she is not getting, nor will Obama.....I will not vote for a woman, or a Muslim to sit in our white house. Electing either, will assure another attack from
terrorist...which are Muslim.....so no we do not need one sitting in our white house. I want some one in the white house who has BALLS. and by not electing Hillary we are assuring that no one on her cabinet will begin to mysteriously die, like in the previous Clinton administration, you know the 8 years that he held us hostage. Had George Stephonolophis not went directly into reporting, his butt may have been dead by now because, he has been friends with the c\Clinton's for along time and knows alot of their secrets just like Vince Foster did.

Answer 7

She is probably the single most important person right now in the World to bring peace and put the Military Industrial Complex to shame and redundancy! I hope that American will become more educated and realise that women empowerment will improve your lives.In so called conservative countries like India, Bangladesh,Pakistan,Sri Lanka,Israel,Philippines,Norway,Germany and the likes had women as Presidents-But Mrs Clinton appears to outshine and will be good for America.Far too long having wars rather than solving it diplomatically has required not a new party but gender!
In to win shows that she is confident to win...I love that..Go Girl go!

Answer 8

Her meaning is a little different. She is trying to intimidate the others because everyone knows there's nothing she wouldn't do to win when she wants to.

Answer 9

Some people are just looking for face time like sharpton or kucinich.

Answer 10

I think she is not the first candidate to ever use that expression and I think that cons will hammer her no matter what she says, no matter how trivial.