do u believe the war is right or wrong? what do u think about bush sending another 20000+ soldiers overseas? what do u believe will happen when 2008 comes and we elect a new president?
2007-01-21 15:16:36 · 14 answers · asked by thumper19_2003 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
1. The war was based on fradulent evidence that Bush knew was wrong.
2. Yes we should send more troops now that we have destroyed Iraq but only if we break them up into 3 states under one government.
3. The next president will be the one to take the fall for Bush's errors.
2007-01-21 15:36:24 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well Thumper my dear I think what GW Did was Right. Saddam had to go. Although i agree with what GW did I think he went about it the wrong way. We should have fought this war as we did others. We should have gone in taken each town& city & take all the wepons & destoryed them.We should have taken ALL combatants on both sides & locked them in camps. Then We should have built a new goverment, rebuilt every thing our self then turned it oover to the new goverment.. Thats what we did in WW2. That is the onlywar we have won lately & that is how we did it. I lost both of my wars ,Vietnam& Gulf 1because we did not do what we did in WW2
2007-01-21 15:32:48 · answer #2 · answered by BUTCH 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think that this war is wrong. I will also say that I didn't vote for President Bush (either time) and I can't say that I've been happy about anything that he has done since he has been in office.
As for 2008, I can not wait to see someone else in office. I could go on to say what qualities I would prefer our next president to have...however at this point I just want to see someone else in office as President.
2007-01-21 15:28:04 · answer #3 · answered by Mary R 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
America will be use nuclear weapons in Iraq and Iran. Iran will retaliate with nuclear weapons. N. Korea will then say whoopee--their turn to use nuclear weapons.
If the Democrats nominate Hillary Clinton or Sen. Obama, then the Republicans will win the White House again. That means more lies, cheating and deceptions.
America! Do not nominate Sen. Clinton or Obama. Please! 8 years of Bush Republicans are enough!
2007-01-21 15:26:07 · answer #4 · answered by calpal2001 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bidding for all products for the militia could be mixed and there could be a decrease of no greater advantageous than 50% greater advantageous than the standard value for a civilian in step with merchandise placed on them. Welfare could be thoroughly reformed. using fact the regular public of mothers in no way complete extreme college, faculties could upload a variety for those on welfare so as that the mummy and the little ones might the two attend every day. area of the mummy's homework every day may be making confident the little ones did theirs. this might provide the little ones the thought practise replaced into significant. If the mummy's have complete extreme college, then they could be enrolled in a preparation software for something greater advantageous than a minimum salary job or placed by using a close-by junior college. although the preliminary expenditure might probable be greater advantageous than our contemporary ones, i've got faith we could in basic terms approximately get rid of welfare interior one era in basic terms by using those variations. All faculties under the college point could be nationalized. Their investment could be sufficient to maintain all of them approximately equivalent in infrastructure, kit like desktops, and turning out to be a instructor could be made lots greater stable. we can not cope with to pay for to have such an choppy practise won in diverse states. we choose ALL our little ones knowledgeable to an identical point, with any luck adequate to get us off the backside of the lists in math and technology. This of direction might value greater, yet interior the long-term might get us our jobs back and set the economy humming back.
2016-10-31 23:18:26 · answer #5 · answered by bonanno 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush based his decision to invade Iraq on foolish emotion. Even though he was warned what would happen, he is the goofy type of person who has to see for himself. The issues about Iraq were too complex for him to understand anyway. And he's not about to admit he was wrong, either. He has zero capacity for introspection.
2007-01-21 15:33:27 · answer #6 · answered by orderly logic 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Keep the enemy busy over there or fight them here. I think it's the right thing to do. The additional troops will help to overwhelm the terrorists. In 2008, even if the war is not over, the new prez will probably continue after they are briefed by the NSA and CIA as to the real threats if we pull out.
2007-01-21 15:22:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
You asked me what I think about war?
Lemme ask you what do you think of living under Islamic Caliphate rule?
How would you like to live under Kim Chee II?
Or how about living under Chinese dicktatorship?
If any of these do not appeal to you, than you better start thinking about war. Sorry, but that's just the way the guys above want it.
2007-01-21 17:58:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I only hope this new plan works, both politically and militarily(even though I disagree with it) that way we can get the hell out of there and bring our troops home.
2007-01-21 15:33:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think Bush
2007-01-21 15:28:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋