Isn't it better to cut your losses and live to fight another day, than to burn all your resources at once?
2007-01-21 15:03:14 · 8 answers · asked by futurevizions 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Look at the military history of the Revolutionary War, and count the number of times GEORGE WASHINGTON retreated... If he hadn't, we wouldn't even have a country. Anyone care to revise their answer??
2007-01-21 16:14:11 · update #1
Better a lame lamb than a dead lion
2007-01-21 15:07:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It all depends on what you are doing. In some cases yes, in others, no. That's a very vague question so it has to be answered with a vague answer. Anything else is just misleading.
2007-01-21 23:06:19 · answer #2 · answered by Need Answers 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely.
2007-01-21 23:05:53 · answer #3 · answered by sal 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Retreat with dis-honer "hm" no it's not better because another day never comes!...
2007-01-21 23:08:20 · answer #4 · answered by no one here gets out alive 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I will say that is a smart thing to do
2007-01-21 23:08:18 · answer #5 · answered by bigdogrex 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree. Especially if you are talking Iraq!
2007-01-21 23:07:14 · answer #6 · answered by Sharonzeke 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Spoken like a true Frenchman or liberal... RETREAT!!!
2007-01-21 23:13:36 · answer #7 · answered by Free Speech 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
hm...contradiction question ...
need revise
2007-01-21 23:06:37 · answer #8 · answered by DlCK Chenney 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋