2007-01-21 13:48:21 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
It's a set-up. The Democrats knew the American public is largely fed up with the same old worn-out political baloney, so they knew they could not run one of their old stand-by candidates. They needed a new face, someone no one ever heard of. They looked around and found Obama, a low-level state politician who was minding his own business and who had no presidential aspirations at all. The democrats grabbed him, staged a bunch of fake rallies with hired crowd wildly chanting "Obama! Obama! Obama!" and shoved him out in front of the microphones and the paid audience went wild on cue. The whole show was a disgusting farce and reminded me of Albert Speer's 1939 Nuremberg rallies designed for the Nazis. Obama is a set-up, and the whole charade is so transparent as to be offensive. It's amazing how a guy who had no desire to be president is now talked up constantly bu the democrats as a top contender. Here is a guy who was nowhere, and now he has been set up by the Democratic machine as Number One. The whole this is a pathetic example of crooked politics and a blatant attempt to deceive the American people.
2007-01-21 13:57:00 · answer #1 · answered by Kokopelli 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I do not agree with you that the Democrats consider him a presidential candidate.. All he is now is a new, pretty face. Since the Dems have been on the presidential light side for a long time, anyone new and different will gain disproportionate attention. He has no experience worth speaking about, but his physical attributes make up for it.
2007-01-21 13:59:27 · answer #2 · answered by The Cythian 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, everyone has to consider him a candidate because he announced his candidacy... Maybe you mean, why do they consider him a viable candidate?
He has quite a popular following and is generally bipartisan. He has a reputation for being honest and caring about his constituents, which can be sadly rare for many politicians. Many people think he genuinely cares about the course our country takes and can be more of a uniter than a divider. This seems to be the race that everyone wants to join, meaning that there is not a consensus candidate among the parties, so it will be an interesting process to get to the two nominations.
2007-01-21 13:56:01 · answer #3 · answered by Dude 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
First of I do not think he is experienced enough to give this country to him at all. A president is as good as his advisers and he has not got a solid associated team for any long periods. He did not grow up in this like some and he is limited. However in time when he proves to be a good Congressman maybe so. The fact that he is 50/50 you have many liberal democrats on board for a color change and that is a mistake, better off with the one who could really fill those shoes, and that is Colin Powell, but he won't run? Too bad I would vote for him.
2007-01-21 13:56:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
This is acutely one of the dumbest questions I've ever heard. Obviously it is a fair assumption that you dislike the man you could at least have the balls to say that one.
The reason why EVERYONE not just Democrats should consider Barack Hussein Obama a candidate is because he is acutely running.
2007-01-21 14:00:22 · answer #5 · answered by slickny8111 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What a strange question. I guess we know which side of the fence you're on!
Why did republicans think that George W. Bush would be a good president? (this question is just as stupid).
The issue is principals and issues. Most of us pick the candidate that closest reflects our principals & issues. Both democats and republicans are patriotic Americans trying to get our country closer to how they invsion the right path do be on.
Neither is better. Just a different way of looking at things.
2007-01-21 14:03:13 · answer #6 · answered by Common Sense 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is no longer something incorrect with it, he's a organic citizen, over the age of 35, so legally he can run. Is he the right guy for the pastime, no. he's way lower than qualified. perhaps you're attempting to race bait? A black human being must be both qualified to run the country as a white human being, even interior the perspectives of something else of the globe. it is purely right here interior the U. S. were we nonetheless have a racial divide, and it is continually observed through liberals.
2016-10-15 22:11:42 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the flip side is Hillary, I just might vote for this guy too because I am tired of always voting for the lesser of two evils.
..and I don't normally vote Dhimmicrat
2007-01-24 12:06:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's just (in some peoples opinion) a pretty boy that will look good standing next to Hillary....which one of them is gonna be the VP is up in the air...bet it will be a cat fight....
2007-01-21 14:26:23 · answer #9 · answered by space0505 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Last time I read the Constitution, the only qualifications were that the person is born in the US and is 35 or over. Obama meets this criteria.
Anyone who meets those two qualifications can run, so get over it.
2007-01-21 13:56:09 · answer #10 · answered by neooxyconservative 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋