2007-01-21 13:44:49 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes...
Who is responsible for the deaths of more Americans?
Bin Laden or Bush?
Lets compare BODY COUNTS:
Osama bin Laden:
First WTC attack: 6 killed
Khobar Towers: 19 killed
U.S. African embassy attacks: 12 Americans
9/11 attacks: 2,973 Killed
USS Cole: 17 Americans killed
Battle of Mogasdishu (Black Hawk Down): 18 Americans Killed.
TOTAL: 3045 Americans dead
George W. Bush:
Iraq War Casualties: 3054 Americans dead.
2007-01-21 13:49:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Your factor is definitely taken yet lots of the yankee freedoms they hate choose suggested. like the assessment between how we wreck and over coddle women while in comparison with their darkish a protracted time innovations-set over the place a woman's place is. We meddle in international affairs interior the call of human rights yet turn our back on oppressed human beings in African countries. To their viewpoint the US govt is a hypocritical liar and bully. A one international govt can not exist as long as Islam stands interior the way. They concern us using fact they understand they are on the NWO schedule for eventual removing. by using inflicting chaos right here it buys them time. The underlying difficulty is a protracted time previous, it replaced into started on the top of WW 2. we could consistently have listened to Patton and MacArthur and eradicated them, don't have formed the state of Israel, and eradicated the Russians mutually as we had the only vast stick in existence. i think of we could consistently have additionally placed the Berlin wall on the French border. The Patriot Act is equivalent to maximum govt labels as that's certainly its names correct opposite. So hypothetically your fact is robust on. the difficulty is that an identical those with a hand interior the attack, additionally drew up the Patriot Act.
2016-10-31 23:09:24 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes but a serious warning the fact you are bringing up the patriot act makes you a terrorist as implementing the p act is like nuking america.
2007-01-21 13:50:30 · answer #3 · answered by fukawthoridy 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Number one what kind of question is that? You are talking about our president, the Commander in Chief of our military. He is protecting, along with our military, our country from terrorist. As for the comment by masivemann you are forgetting that all the poeple that were killed during 9/11 were civilians. Not our military, that are armed and ready to fight, wake-up!!!!
2007-01-21 14:14:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The definition of terrorist should be abolished simply because US attacked Iraq and ignore Geneve Convention and the UN as the World's organization for the make-believe WMD in Iraq!
2007-01-21 14:02:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
this is rather a dumb question but here goes. A terrorist by definition is a person who instills fear, to make afraid. to cause terror. Although i do not agree with all of pres. bush's actions. the reason is not to cause terror. so the answer is no.
2007-01-21 13:51:51 · answer #6 · answered by ussoldier 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, he is not a terrorist by any stretch of the imagination. I think he's made some fatal mistakes, but I don't think it's fair to label him as a terrorist.
2007-01-21 13:50:32 · answer #7 · answered by gldjns 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
If this were the case, he would be tried as a terrorist as we speak.
2007-01-21 13:49:38 · answer #8 · answered by tcbtoday123 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
No. That is a ridiculous question. Bush is FIGHTING terrorists.
2007-01-21 13:48:30 · answer #9 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Anyone who answers yes to this rediculous question demonstrates their lack of intelligence.
2007-01-21 13:49:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋