No...and this is why...Who is responsible for the deaths of more Americans?
Bin Laden or Bush?
Lets compare BODY COUNTS:
Osama bin Laden:
First WTC attack: 6 killed
Khobar Towers: 19 killed
U.S. African embassy attacks: 12 Americans
9/11 attacks: 2,973 Killed
USS Cole: 17 Americans killed
Battle of Mogasdishu (Black Hawk Down): 18 Americans Killed.
TOTAL: 3045 Americans dead
George W. Bush:
Iraq War Casualties: 3054 Americans dead.
2007-01-21 13:46:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
6⤋
You already have your opinions. You don't need a rah-rah chorus.
Bush is not a moron. Morons don't get elected president. He didn't cheat to get into office either time. In 2000, he won Florida and the certified vote totals were contested by Gore. In 2004, there's no proof of any cheating, and we are legally a society where everyone is innocent until proven guilty. No proof = not guilty. Note to futurevizion: Conjecture and conspiracy theories do not equate to proof. Without completely discounting the likelihood of malfeasance, there is an addage that goes roughly like this: don't ascribe to malice that which can be attributed to incompetence. There were places where voters from 8 different precincts voted -- and the voting officials obviously didn't do a good enough job keeping voters from using the wrong voting machine to vote.
That being said, don't get the idea that I'm a shill. I absolutely abhor the job he's done as president. Iraq was an appropriate action, but it was justified with lies it didn't need and executed absolutely wretchedly. Bush's authoritarianism hurts the U.S.' credibility on the global stage.
As far as death stats go, the 3,500+ casualties in the Iraq war are not Bush's. They are the Iraqi insurgents'.
2007-01-21 21:53:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by achue500 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
Well going on IQ he isn't the smartest president and proves it with what he says sometimes but overall he is no worse then any other president since Reagan. I mean come on the war in Iraq is not all his fault what about the liberals stopping anything he tries to do over there? What about our soldiers having to follow the rules of combat stated in the Geneva convention, while our enemies don't.
It seems everyone complaint is he is a moron, he lied, Americans are dying in Iraq. Well Personally I'd rather have the fight take place over there then in my city where it would be American civilians dying not Iraqi.
So in closing I like Bush though he isn't a genius. An' most people would have a better view of him if it wasn't for the Liberia ls and the drive by media.
2007-01-21 22:07:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Why even ask a question you answered yourself. You have to think of a better reason then he is a moron (which you typed twice), That's kind of grade school don't you think? The person that wrote that he is the reason for 9/11 is completely and totally un-educated. I am surprised you can even turn your computer on. When will you all understand that this war needs to fought, it's either their soil or ours. I personally prefer theirs. So my answer is a big fat YES!!!!! I love Bush!!!!! One more thing as for massivemann get a new response you have used it twice already.
2007-01-21 22:28:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
He's an idiot who's driven one company after another into the ground. Why is anyone suprised that he's doing the same thing to our country? Plus, 9/11 happened because he hated Democrats- and especially Bill Clinton- so much that he IGNORED all the warnings! The vast majority of Democrats gave Bush the benefit of the doubt: when he warned of a threat in Iraq, they threw partisanship out the window and heeded that warning. They gave Bush the benefit of the doubt, that is, until it became obvious he'd lied about WMD. They didn't want to make the kind of mistake Bush had: ignoring a threat and costing thousands of American lives.
Note to achue500: There WAS cheating, at least in Cuyahoga County, Ohio in 2004. One of my closest friends had been registered to vote and voted in EVERY election since 2000... Yet somehow, when she turned up at the polls that day, her name had mysteriously disappeared from the list of registered voters. And she wasn't alone: THOUSANDS of residents of Cuyahoga County lodged complaints about the same problem. Yet somehow, the total number of votes cast in the county exceeded the total number of registered voters by almost 100,000!
2007-01-21 21:58:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by futurevizions 2
·
3⤊
3⤋
Why don't you just ask, "Who likes poison?"
If George Bush can play a shell game with WMDs, rely on faulty intelligence, run up the deficit while proclaiming to be a fiscal conservative, compromise the judiciary with controversial appointments, promote an energy policy that no one believes in, hold no one accountable for 9/11, undermine our alliances, and advocate tax breaks for the wealthy, then it is fair to say that the trust issue is up for grabs.
2007-01-21 21:56:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Fester 3
·
4⤊
3⤋
He is kind of like an evil verson of the Wizard in the Wizard of Oz.
I don't think Bush has a clue, cares about the average American citizen, and starts wars at his pleasure. Beyond that he is delusional. No, I can not stand him. I still think he and Cheney need to be impeached.
2007-01-21 21:49:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by planksheer 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
I do not care for the man. I agree with all of your reasons and will add another that rankles me greatly.
I am a United Methodist and Bush claims to be. However, our church is expressly opposed to war, except in the most extreme situations. I don't really think Bush has any idea what his chosen church believes.
2007-01-21 21:47:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by KERMIT M 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
I have always liked Bush, and what he has done for this great nation of ours.
2007-01-21 21:47:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
apparently just 20% still like him and they are here on this board.
2007-01-21 21:53:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Enigma 6
·
4⤊
2⤋