English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Just idle curiosity. But it must be pretty small.

2007-01-21 11:55:44 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

6 answers

I make it about 10^-35 radians. tell you what you conert that to degrees using pi rad =180deg and we'll all sleep more safely!

2007-01-21 12:42:15 · answer #1 · answered by troothskr 4 · 1 0

In round figures, 1 light year = 10^18 centimetres, so 1 billion of them = 10^27 centimetres, and 1 atom = 10^-8 centimetres so the angle is 10^-35 of a radian just as the previous answerer says. Pretty small, but still just a number. Much smaller numbers arise in some calculations in quantum physics.

2007-01-22 08:31:44 · answer #2 · answered by bh8153 7 · 0 0

No kidding!

Here's the formula you need:

δ = 2 arctan ((1/2d)/D),
in which δ is the angular diameter, and d and D are the diameter of and the distance to the object, expressed in the same units. When D is much larger than d, δ may be approximated by the formula δ = d / D, in which the result is in radians.

Let me know, it's gotta be infitessimal. The scientific notation on this one is going to have a lot of zeros!

2007-01-21 20:07:03 · answer #3 · answered by ~XenoFluX 3 · 0 0

You have reached the physical limit of the universe (as we currently understand it).

1.6×10−35 m is the Planck length (size of a "string", as in string theory)

2007-01-23 15:39:08 · answer #4 · answered by Steve B 7 · 0 0

Infinitesimal... that's about the best answer you can give. Very large and very small numbers are practically meaningless when it comes to comprehending their scale.

2007-01-21 20:05:50 · answer #5 · answered by Arkalius 5 · 0 1

Sorry but i have to know what direction you are facing before I could possibly answer that question.

2007-01-21 20:05:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers