English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think we should pay for this war right now, with fiscal year by year taxes, so the baby boomers cannot stick their children and grandchildren with this boondoggle crippling bill. Why not pay right up front? That is the conservative course.

2007-01-21 11:36:11 · 4 answers · asked by Timothy M 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

4 answers

The Bush economic policy is based on paying later. Without the huge deficits, the American Economy would be in the toilet.

He has the same idea of handling money as my mother-in-law. She is 67 and doesn't have a pot to piss in after working her whole life because she always spend every dime she made plus a little more. She'll be moving in with my wife and I soon enough. That'll be great.

That's where Reagan, Bush 41, and Bush 43's monetary policies will get us. America living under a bridge owned by foreign interests.

By the way, my mother-in-law is a tried and true Republican. So, if you are wondering who supports these jack-asses. It's non-thinkers like her.

2007-01-21 11:44:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We are ALL going to be paying for a war that should have not been our issue in the first place. And our children and their children and etc, until they decide they have had enough or someone blows up the world and then we won't have to worry about it.
I got an idea, why not make the politcian's dig in their own pocket's if they want to fight. It is not our fault.

2007-01-21 11:45:27 · answer #2 · answered by cprucka 4 · 1 0

No, united statesa. could desire to be buying the educatuion of Iraqi babies who have been as quickly as among the main literate and terrific knowledgeable interior the international. on account that united statesa.'s vile conflict you have grew to become their coaching device into one that is on a par with third international international places. you ought to additionally pay to get their healthcare returned on aim and you're able to desire to compensate each and every harmless Iraqi family members who've lost a pal due on your international places administrations evil strikes by profession. you apart from mght could desire to compensate the families of the 4000 united statestroops who've died on account which you sent them to conflict according to lies and greed.

2016-11-26 00:56:10 · answer #3 · answered by greenwald 4 · 0 0

That would be great but, i think we will pay, our children will pay,and there children will pay...never ending cycle

2007-01-21 11:45:17 · answer #4 · answered by Poker Face 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers