Montana lost 2 NFC Championship games, Bradshaw lost 2 AFC Championship games. Brady is undefeated.
2007-01-21 11:38:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by d b 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
He's already in the same class as those guys, in my opinion. He's got a better playoff record than either of those guys, and he's had 2 game-winning drives in 3 Super Bowl victories. Regardless of what happens this time around, he'll still be known as a great, winning QB.
As for the guy who said the first 3 were flukes - how in the world do you get through a 16-game schedule, three playoff rounds, and then the Super Bowl itself, but still call it a fluke? Especially after they've done it 3 times!
I'm not a fan of the Pats, but I respect what Brady has done. And he's a much better QB than was Bradshaw, who was surrounded by more talent than Brady has seen in his whole career.
2007-01-21 19:38:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Craig S 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not to me... Bradshaw played back in the day when QB's were men... todays QB's are so overprotected by the rules there is no way you can make that comparison. All you have to do is look at a QB the wrong way these days and the refs throw a flag... its a total joke...
2007-01-21 19:35:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Fred Phaggins 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, good question. I think it puts him in that class, with Montana though being the Michael Jordan and Brady being the Kobe Bryant talent wise, not charachter wise.
2007-01-21 20:22:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no way! he has a ways to go if he wants to be on the same level as Montana, Bradshaw heck even aiken
2007-01-21 19:37:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mr. Sir 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell no i got no respect for Brady
2001 2003 2004 were a fluke
because of the defense they not cause of brady
2007-01-21 19:32:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He's way better than Bradshaw ever was.
2007-01-21 19:33:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by I'll Take That One! 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
terry had 4 so maybe
2007-01-21 19:33:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋