English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The commission was mostly a public relations exercise. Why did Bush oppose an investigation? Why did Bush refuse to testify under oath? Why did he refuse to testify unless Cheney was present?

2007-01-21 11:22:11 · 16 answers · asked by sal 2 in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

Sheeple People who refuse to accept the fact that the Bush administration Orchestrated the Terror Attacks of 911 are nothing but pure Morons! It's impossible for a fire to melt steel unless it is assisted by something like "oxygen/acetylene" Jet fuel or Kerosene does not burn hot enough to melt steel...LOOK AT THE PERIODIC TABLE OF ELEMENTS. Also if the floors where the planes hit collapsed causing a chain reaction it would have taken well over 90 seconds for the buildings to come down. They came down at free fall speed....9 seconds. There is no logical argument here. Explosives were pre-planted in the building. Case closed! Why are so many people having a hard time accepting this?

George Bush President of the United States is a man who has flushed all honor and integrity down the toilet. He has spread shame on America, it's Constitution, and it's People. It is a highly embarrassing situation for every Good American. This Man has spun completely out of control and he needs to be stopped immediately. President Bush has discounted himself to nothing more then a mere "War Criminal."

2007-01-21 11:27:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Not so long as everyone thinks there were 19 hijackers.
I personally think that there were none.
Yes, 2 airplanes hit the twin towers.
Did they actually come from Evergreen Air Park, north of Tucson, Arizona, a known CIA airbase. It's secretive and has jumbo jets parked all over the place, and other aircraft, too.
Technology could have guided these planes into the towers.
NASA, if you'll recall, is part of the military-industrial-intelligence complex, having its own security department, which is very secret, of course.
There are many things about that day that show something isn't right, even down to the "phone calls" from the planes.
This all goes so deep that who would believe it could be true.
I'm not going to leave any links on here, because I would have to put them all on here to really address your question.
So, unequivocally, maybe.

2007-01-21 11:44:32 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No, because 9/11 was a scapegoat for bush and he does not want to have this revealed. It is the reason he was able to get into the middle east. From there on it was just spreading.

2007-01-21 11:26:27 · answer #3 · answered by Kurtis A 2 · 1 0

No. We do not investigate thoroughly things of that magnitude. Look at the Kennedy assassination.
Only after many generations have passed is there any chance of a real good investigation.

2007-01-21 11:28:29 · answer #4 · answered by johnfarber2000 6 · 1 0

honestly no longer. There has already been an learn. To do yet another you will be a extreme waste of time, taxpayer money, and substances. notwithstanding, in case you may sufficient inner most funding and self reliant investigators, then bypass for it.

2016-12-02 20:55:31 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Based on currently held intel at the time and having already been investigated by the top investigators in the world, (not just the U.S.), it's already been clearly determined without a shadow of doubt. Where do you all come up with these conspiracy theories?.. unbelievable!
(Man!... get an education, would you? You're makin' America look stupid!).

2007-01-21 11:31:03 · answer #6 · answered by love_2b_curious 6 · 0 2

Because we know the truth. Terrorists (Al Queda) flew airplanes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

2007-01-21 11:45:19 · answer #7 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 0 0

Give it up. Thats what I did, just enjoy life as much as you can in the present.

2007-01-21 11:25:07 · answer #8 · answered by lvillejj 4 · 0 1

No point asking this here. You'll just get a bunch of rednecks all riled up..

2007-01-21 11:25:26 · answer #9 · answered by kberto 3 · 0 1

well i reckon there won't be one while bush is in office since it was in his term that this happened, and if things go uncovered....well i doubt he'll look good

2007-01-21 11:26:14 · answer #10 · answered by no_bsht 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers