She hoodwinked Paul McCartney. The rest of the world saw how false and shallow she was. Suppose he thinks it's worth every penny just to get rid of the evil gargoyle. Hope Linda McCartney comes to haunt her and beat her over the head with her wooden leg.
2007-01-21 11:19:50 · 13 answers · asked by Daisy Roots 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Donk- You are Hilarious!!!
2007-01-21 11:58:48 · update #1
How much does she need, after all , shes needs to keep up her appearence, which means a bottle of IMAC for 1 of her legs & a sheet of sandpaper for the other , so £6.50 should cover that...
2007-01-21 11:45:48 · answer #1 · answered by DONK 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think she's possibly more vindictive - the 'money' thing is possibly just a way of getting at Paul. I think he married someone who looked very vaguely like Linda - so the marriage was doomed to fail. Possibly someone close should have sat him down and talked him out of it. As for Heather Mills legal bid - she hasn't got a leg to stand on (old joke - but still funny).
2007-01-21 12:38:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If the media would have let them be husband and wife instead of a Beatle and a wooden legged not good enough female, then they would still be together!
The media picked the meat off of this poor girls bones! Nobody will ever be accepted as a spouse for Paul because he's Royality in his own right. When Linda passed away the whole world felt bad for Paul because they had such a unique love. She's a tough act to follow! Poor Heather!
She tried to be a good wife and what the public wanted was a Linda replacement and she wasn't so they 'tarred and feathered' her! Paul still loves her and he knows that the marriage could never work because the media and his 'public' fans, are just too protective of their idol to allow him to ever have any kind of NORMAL existence! Paul is really a victim in all of this, and I wonder if he will ever be allowed to have someone to love?
2007-01-21 13:28:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
i do not understand the girl, even though it type of feels to me that if she were no longer after Paul M's money at the same time as she married him she wouldnt be turning their divorce into the type of circus. for sure, definite, she merits something major; in spite of everything she become component of his existence, or maybe if he went by ability of she did with him at the same time as they were married; Plus she has a baby now she needs to guard. although, she actually will besides have more suitable money than she ever had in her sorry existence previously assembly PM. So, if she were particularly straightforward she ought to settle for something yet no longer soliciting for what she's actually no longer entitled to. Yeah; she does make me sick. She makes it perplexing for human beings to settle for you should likely love someone for who they're and under no circumstances what they own. PM's daughter under no circumstances needed her to be in her dad's existence. She become appropriate.
2016-10-15 22:02:43 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you there, Heather Mills-McCartney is nothing more than a gold digging harlot! I wholeheartedly agree!
2007-01-21 11:24:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
poor girl what a sh1t time we give her maybe she did love him now lets think whats Paul McCartney got going for him
no cant think of anything
she is a money grabber
2007-01-21 12:59:20 · answer #6 · answered by top cat 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yeh she is
i heard also, that she is making paul mcCartney pay £2000.00 a week on her rent!!!
2007-01-21 22:38:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anon 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
We can only hear what they say , ,
read it in the paper . . or wherever the
news may come from , ,
If she's gold digger, don't worry there's
always a time to pay, harvest time . . .
2007-01-21 11:33:01 · answer #8 · answered by JUSS 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Me. But in her defence, Paul McCartney should have known better. Can you say PRE-NUP, Paul???
2007-01-21 11:28:09 · answer #9 · answered by b97st 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
She is wealthy in her own right. You seem to have fallen for tabloid tales and Paul propaganda.
2007-01-21 11:30:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋