It is a horrible idea, but one that the three countries and Bush's PNAC/GOP is already embracing along with the "New world order."
From the website cited: "Despite having no authorization from Congress, the Bush administration has launched extensive working-group activity to implement a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada.
The membership of the working groups has not been published, nor has their work product been disclosed, despite two years of massive effort within the executive branches of the U.S., Mexico and Canada.
The groups, working under the North American Free Trade Agreement office in the Department of Commerce, are to implement the Security and Prosperity Partnership, or SPP, signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, on March 23, 2005. "
2007-01-21 11:36:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by hera 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think this would disadvantage the entire continent. How could one government efficiently run a nation of such enormous proportions? Defence would definitely be an issue, and democracy would be an inefficient way of governing a nation so big. That's just my opinion though.
2007-01-21 10:48:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by tupcat 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
I sure hope not. America's already having to many trouble's. There would be twice as much if they would be joined in as a country.
With Canada It wouldn't bother me but i'm sure it would bother them with our country joining their country because they probably think that our country is not good enough for there Country.
2007-01-21 10:49:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by jrealitytv 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
i'm frankly indignant by skill of the somewhat some solutions to this question. Why is it that human beings assume that a spiritual man or woman could desire to be stupid? Why is it mandatory to convey returned greater of the fake stereotypes approximately inbreeding to respond to this question. For the record, i grow to be born and raised in Chicago and have lived my grownup existence interior the west.although, my father grow to be from Tennessee close to the Georgia border. In each and all of the years, I traveled down south, the only lack of information I observed grow to be their racism. you do no longer could desire to have a college degree to be clever! the better answer is for my section: a million. After the Civil conflict, the North ignored Lincoln's desire to rebuild the south and rather ravaged it further with carpetbaggers and different such offensive rules. The south grow to be left with out its commercial beginning place. It grew to grow to be based on agriculture. 2. opposite to the conceitedness that the commercial cities of the north convey greater effective peace and happiness, human beings interior the city have an inclination to lose themselves in " busyness". so they forget approximately or bury their inner religious want with "issues" and "excitement". human beings down south, outdoors the foremost cities stay closer to the land and have a deeper appreciation of the indoors religious want. They spend greater time in prayer, scripture reading and different skill to nurture that starvation rather of burying it. 3. Thirdly, the human beings down south have suffered hassle that no important northern commercial city had known till ny and 9/eleven. After the Civil conflict the human beings have been broken. Their babies have been killed, their properties and farms burned, their commercial cities destroyed, their railroads broken. They discovered to instruct to some thing greater effective than themselves to discover help. they have on no account lost that deep faith. I had no reason to respond to this question, yet as a lifelong northerner, a number of those solutions indignant me. Pastor John
2016-11-26 00:47:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bad idea - I think the U.S. is already too big to really manage effectively.
Besides, Mexico's culture is so beautiful, and I wouldn't want that to dissappear even faster than it currently is.
2007-01-21 10:46:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by keengrrl76 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Horrible idea. Our freedoms will be taken away to pull that off, you know about that, right?
2007-01-21 11:07:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by CJ 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
bad idea people will go crazy if we do that. you are wierd for just asking.
2007-01-21 11:02:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by courtney w 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
as if we don't have enough people on welfare.
2007-01-21 13:06:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by thevillageidiotxxxxx 4
·
0⤊
0⤋