Good Lord, NO! 8 years of the Clinton's was *more* than enough. He slashed our intel budgets, increased our oil imports from IRAQ of all places, and cared far more about himself than the country. I don't see Hillary being any different. Besides, both Bill and Hill agreed that Saddam had WMDs and had to be stopped, but now Hill claims she was "tricked". Why on earth would we elect someone who admits she's easily duped?!?
2016-03-14 21:38:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'd vote for hillary over any republican candidate in a heartbeat. if we have another hardcore, so-called "christian," republican, IDIOT as a president again, i might just have to shoot myself.
2007-01-21 10:16:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
she.. IS.. running for presidency..
she wont make it.. shes giving republicans votes...
Its so obvious that she is not there to help this country, she is there for the celeb-status... its sick.
Why didnt she divorse bill after he cheated on her, openly..?
Uhm, hes the president of the mo.fo. United States! She needed him to become senator in NYC, and now the president of the United States.
But the American people, i HOPE, will see through this.
Her firmness on things and such is fake. Shes got this woman-power vibe about her... She does it for the attention. Shes a girl who hasn't grown out of high-school... She thinks shes in the popular group and every1 admires her. She goes out with the captain of the football team for the fame and power it gives her, no matter how much she doesnt really fit in..
The way she says things that are anti-bush, just.. sound lame.
Most democratic runners make up the bs, and the media exploits it.. the thing with Hilary is that, you just feel it from the tone she uses or something that, instead of that... she doesnt come up with the ideas or anything, its like she hears this stuff on the news, then says it... when you can tell in her voice and in her sentences, that she doesnt have the passion someone would if they strongly believed in what they said. Its so noticable, its just hard to explain, its a vibe and a feeling you get when you hear her speak, shes just a rich girl stuck in her past that wants the attention...
Maybe people will see that she is a media-follower by her vibes ..and their minds will slowly start to open.., and the people will finally see through this media mahem.
Bill Clinton is running for president in 2008.
If Hilary, just pretend, is president in 2008, it will be Bill Clinton who is the president and the idea maker... not ... Hilary...
Bill will tell Hilary what to say, and Hilary will be the one with the spotlight on her..
I want to see Hilary Clinton in a conversation with a fellow Democrat and an opposing Republican. I want them to bring up things never mentioned before in the campaign, nor the midterm elections. See how Hilary responds. My bet? She agrees with everything the friendly Democrat says and goes 'Hilary Clinton style ape-sh*t' on the Republican on every issue. Without having reasons such as past-events, logics, personal theories or anything. Thus, proving everything i've said above about how shes there for the spotlight, whether or not she realizes it, and is not one to think for herself.
The days she does have her own ideas are the ones in which she has her period. Still, she doesnt make a plan for Iraq or anything that takes self-determination or intelligence when she has her period. Rather, she goes on TV, sounding like Rosie O'Donell, and rants about Obama being a Muslim.
Having Bill as president again isn't all that bad of an idea, but having Hilary Clinton as his filter to all his ideas, is a bad idea. Its a severe-scaled version of the current president and congress relationship. Hilary will be treating it more like a popularity thing. One day shell pick the Madonna card in which she will do something to start controversy, just to get her face in the news. And other days shell pick the Popular card, in which she will do something to get more people to like her, regardless of the logic, or importance of the policy.
Thats not what i want in my president.
Ive heard morning radio stations say "Man, Hilary Clinton would do so much better if she just had someone else do her speaches.." ( in a funny but true tone of voice )
Yea... ^^^^^^THATS WHY^^^^^^^ everything above this line, ive explained WHY, she needs Bill Clinton doing her speaches... because he's the one that wrote them! lol.
Dont call me a sexist/racist jerk against a woman being in a form of power larger then my own because thats not true.
I dont support Hilary Clinton, I dont support Nancy Pelosi, but hell i voted for Kerry Healy (a white fairly-young woman) over now-gov. Deval Patrick (a black young man) and Christy Mihos (a white middle aged man) In the Mass. Governer's poll..
Give me a woman that i think can handle being the president and i will vote for them.. till then im voting for McCain..
Please view my sources and, even if you currently disagree with me, please try to stay open-minded to what i've said, and pay attention to her tone and just her ... idk.. vibes she has about her..
At the beginning, shes a good actor and ill be honest, she hides what ive been saying above, but pay attention to the things she lists and when she says "Because things in the white house, lately, have been kinda one sided lately.."
Keep in in your head when you listen to her in the future, when she doesnt get to do takes and such to perfect her acting... btw the uneven cut towards the middle was cute, her message must come natural.. Thats probably why she sounds like shes trying to remember her script word-for-word... a script written by bill clinton perhaps?
The difference between her and (though i necessarilly dont plan on voting for him, i will stick with a Democrat to keep my credibility on me not being a Republican whose speaking out of their ***..) Barack Obama is that atleast, though i may not agree with the things he says, he does mean what he says. If the Republicans fail in trying to ride America of the media virus, i would rather have someone confident in their policies as president, rather then someone fake like Hilary Clinton in the Presidents Chair.
2007-01-21 09:18:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Corey 4
·
0⤊
2⤋